Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.25143/socr.20.2021.2.188-211
Title: Ārstniecības personas tiesības paust savu reliģisko pārliecību darba tiesiskajās attiecībās
Other Titles: Right of Medical Practitioner to Express Their Religious Beliefs in Employment Relations
Authors: Šāberte, Laura
Tarasova, Dace
Palkova, Karina
Faculty of Law
Keywords: expression of religion;medical practitioner;medical law;labour law;prohibition of discrimination;5.5 Law;1.2. Scientific article included in INT1 or INT2 category journal of ERIH database
Issue Date: 2021
Citation: Šāberte , L , Tarasova , D & Palkova , K 2021 , ' Ārstniecības personas tiesības paust savu reliģisko pārliecību darba tiesiskajās attiecībās ' , Socrates , vol. 20 , no. 2 , pp. 188-211 . https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.20.2021.2.188-211
Abstract: The rights of medical practitioners are broadly defined in both national and international legislation. The scope of the rights of medical practitioners is evolving along with the development of certain sub-sectors of the field of law. One of the topical issues in the context of the exercise of the rights of medical practitioners is the right of medical practitioners to express their religious beliefs from the Labor law perspective. The right of medical practitioners to freedom of religion is to be seen as part of human rights as well. Member States that have acceded to human rights instruments that protect the right to freedom of religion do not have the right to intervene and take coercive measures to change these views. The right to freedom of religion at the level of human rights applies to a medical practitioner as an individual living in a democratic society and as a person with a medical education who is engaged in medical treatment or prevention, diagnosis and treatment, medical rehabilitation and patient care has rights and obligations within the framework of the activity. The aim of the article is to study the right of medical practitioners to express their religious beliefs in employment relations, as well as to identify problematic issues researching the case law of the CJEU and the ECtHR.
DOI: 10.25143/socr.20.2021.2.188-211
ISSN: 2256-0548
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
_rstniec_bas_personas_ties_bas.pdf324.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Openopen_acces_unlocked


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.