Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.22364/atee.2022.63
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSvence, Guna-
dc.contributor.authorBriška, Ilze-
dc.contributor.authorApse, Vineta-
dc.contributor.editorDaniela, Linda-
dc.coverage.spatialRīga-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-30T08:45:01Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-30T08:45:01Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationSvence , G , Briška , I & Apse , V 2023 , Indicators of Social Emotional Health (SEHS-T) and Resilience in the Latvian Teachers’ Sample . in L Daniela (ed.) , To Be or Not To Be a Great Educator : proceedings of ATEE annual conference, 2022 . ATEE Annual Conference , Latvijas Universitāte , Rīga , pp. 935-952 , ATEE Annual Conference, 2022 , Rīga , Latvia , 29/08/22 . https://doi.org/10.22364/atee.2022.63-
dc.identifier.citationconference-
dc.identifier.isbn9789934360190-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.rsu.lv/jspui/handle/123456789/15138-
dc.description.abstractIn crisis situations, on the one hand, teachers must be resilient, know not only how the didactic of the subject works, but also technologies, the psychology of pupils, classroom management, self- regulation, time management, self-compassion etc. Research on teachers’ social emotional health and resilience is important for quality learning and well-being at school, especially during the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. The following paper provides a description of the study that was carried out in Latvia on the problems of teachers’ social and emotional health distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, and in the context of an international study in the Erasmus + project research “Teacher resilience: problems and solutions. Supporting teachers to face the challenge of distance teaching’’. Therefore, the samples are denoted by N1 = 23, N2 = 635, N3 = 380, N4 = 245. The main question of the paper is: Which of the variables (burnout, work engagement strategies) most significantly predict teachers’ social-emotional health indicators? The results showed that there were statistically significant positive correlations between teachers` SEHS-T, teacher engagement, and emotional burnout rates. The other results show low scores from SEHS-T which could indicate that teachers’ self-confidence could be problematic, which could be explained by their uncertainty about their work during distance learning in a stressful COVID-19 crisis and that they need support for developing their strengths. The other results show that Resilience are moderate medium, but about 18% of the sample demonstrates the lowest Resilience scores. Results from SEHS-T: the subscale of teacher work engagement Cognitive engagement (p< 0.001) is significant in predicting SEH-T indicators.en
dc.format.extent263385-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherLatvijas Universitāte-
dc.relation.ispartofTo Be or Not To Be a Great Educator-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesATEE Annual Conference-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.subject5.1 Psychology-
dc.subject5.3 Educational sciences-
dc.subject3.2. Articles or chapters in other proceedings other than those included in 3.1., with an ISBN or ISSN code-
dc.titleIndicators of Social Emotional Health (SEHS-T) and Resilience in the Latvian Teachers’ Sampleen
dc.type/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontobookanthology/conference-
dc.identifier.doi10.22364/atee.2022.63-
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed-
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Indicators_of_social_emotional_Health.pdf257.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Openopen_acces_unlocked


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.