Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2022
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSvence, Guna-
dc.contributor.authorBriška, Ilze-
dc.contributor.editorDaniela, Linda-
dc.coverage.spatialRīga-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-02T11:25:01Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-02T11:25:01Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-
dc.identifier.citationSvence , G & Briška , I 2022 , Teachers’ Social-Emotional Health and Resilience in Covid-19 Crisis : Latvian Sample . in L Daniela (ed.) , Human, Technologies and Quality of Education, 2022 : proceedings of scientific papers = Cilvēks, tehnoloģijas un izglītības kvalitāte, 2022 : rakstu krājums . Latvijas Universitāte , Rīga , pp. 402-417 , 80th International Scientific Conference of the University of Latvia , Riga , Latvia , 11/02/22 . https://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2022-
dc.identifier.citationconference-
dc.identifier.isbn978-9934-18-911-1-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.rsu.lv/jspui/handle/123456789/9983-
dc.description.abstractResearch on social-emotional health and resilience of Latvian teachers was conducted as part of the ERASMUS+ project “Supporting teachers to face the challenge of distance teaching”. The aim of this study is to assess teachers’ social-emotional health and resilience to reveal those areas which require significant support and development in the Covid-19 pandemic situation. In the article, the concepts used in the project – social-emotional health, resilience, covitality will be theoretically analysed to substantiate the structure of the empirical study. Teachers’ mental health was tested using Social-emotional Health Survey– Teachers SEHS-T (Furlong et al., 2017; Furlong et al., 2014; Furlong & Gajdošová, 2018, as mentioned in Lapiņa, 2021) and Resilience Scale RS 25 (Wagnild & Young, 1993; Wagnild, 2009; Wagnild, 2016) with supplementary questions. 636 teachers of general and vocational schools took part in the research. The results identified that positive teachers’ strengths are self-regulation, empathy, and cognitive reappraisal. However, the teachers demonstrated limits in resilience as such, and in some scores of SEHS-T, as in covitality domain Belief in Others, especially in institutional and colleagues’ support, and in Engaged Living – gratitude and zest. The identified weaknesses and limits will be used as a foundation for preparing further intervention activities – a digital psychological support programme for strengthening the teachers’ resilience and mental health in general.en
dc.format.extent402916-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherLatvijas Universitāte-
dc.relation.ispartofHuman, Technologies and Quality of Education, 2022-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.subjectSocial-emotional health-
dc.subjectstrengths-
dc.subjectlimitations-
dc.subjectteachers-
dc.subjectresilience-
dc.subject5.1 Psychology-
dc.subject3.2. Articles or chapters in other proceedings other than those included in 3.1., with an ISBN or ISSN code-
dc.subjectSDG 4 - Quality Education-
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being-
dc.titleTeachers’ Social-Emotional Health and Resilience in Covid-19 Crisis : Latvian Sampleen
dc.type/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontobookanthology/chapter-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2022-
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed-
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.