Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.24.2022.3.091-105
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLosevich, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorLaizāns, Aigars-
dc.contributor.authorKudeikina, Inga-
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Latvia, Faculty of Medicine, Riga, Latviaen
dc.contributor.otherBJK Advocates, Riga, Latviaen
dc.contributor.otherRīga Stradiņš University, Faculty of Law, Latviaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-23T15:19:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-23T15:19:48Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationLosevich, M., Laizāns, A., & Kudeikina, I. (2022). Aspects of Contractual Relations in Healthcare. Electronic Scientific Journal of Law Socrates, 3 (24). 91–105. https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.24.2022.3.091-105en
dc.identifier.issn2256-0548-
dc.identifier.other91–105-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.rsu.lv/jspui/handle/123456789/9951-
dc.description.abstractThe article aims to determine the scope and limitations of ethical duties and legal responsibilities of the medical practitioner within the professional-patient relationship (PPR), identify shortcomings of the legal framework and gaps in ethical principles, and propose solutions to them. It argues that in private law the healthcare shares many similarities with conractual law; therefore, the legal basis for physician-patient relationship is the special legal capacity of the contract parties and their free will, but ethical basis ‒ their good faith. One important finding is that physician right and obligation to refuse is an aspect of patient safety and quality of healthcare and has to be acknowledged by ethics and stipulated by law. In addition, it detects that medical professionals are ethically and legally vulnerable and need special protection. All this calls to carving out the proper place of medical practitioners’ professional autonomy and freedom in current legal regulation. Used materials include literature and scientific publications on clinical and research bioethics, contractual and medical law, regulatory enactments, court judgments. Methods used in the study include descriptive, analysis, synthesis, dogmatic, induction and deduction; legal interpretation methods such as grammatical and systemic.en
dc.formatElectronic-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherRīga Stradiņš Universityen
dc.publisherRīgas Stradiņa universitātelv_LV
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSocrates 2022, 3 (24)-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectSocrates 2022, 3 (24)-
dc.subjectpatient’s rightsen
dc.subjectphysician’s rightsen
dc.subjectphysician’s autonomyen
dc.subjectprofessional-patient relationshipen
dc.subjectright to refuseen
dc.subjectmedical liabilityen
dc.titleAspects of Contractual Relations in Healthcareen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.25143/socr.24.2022.3.091-105-
Appears in Collections:Socrates. 2022, 3 (24)

Files in This Item:


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons