Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac081
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKruis, Wolfgang-
dc.contributor.authorSiegmund, Britta-
dc.contributor.authorLesniakowski, Konrad-
dc.contributor.authorSimanenkov, Vladimir-
dc.contributor.authorKhimion, Ludmila-
dc.contributor.authorSobon, Marcin-
dc.contributor.authorDelmans, Glebs-
dc.contributor.authorMaksyashina, Svetlana V.-
dc.contributor.authorSablin, Oleg A.-
dc.contributor.authorPokrotnieks, Juris-
dc.contributor.authorMostovoy, Yuriy-
dc.contributor.authorDatsenko, Olena-
dc.contributor.authorAbdulkhakov, Sayar-
dc.contributor.authorDorofeyev, Andriy-
dc.contributor.authorLevchenko, Olena-
dc.contributor.authorAlexeeva, Olga-
dc.contributor.authorAndreev, Pavel-
dc.contributor.authorKolesnik, Ivan P.-
dc.contributor.authorMihaly, Emese-
dc.contributor.authorAbrahamovych, Orest-
dc.contributor.authorBaluta, Malgorzata-
dc.contributor.authorKharchenko, Nataliia-
dc.contributor.authorViacheslav, Neshta-
dc.contributor.authorUspenskiy, Yury-
dc.contributor.authorVieth, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorMohrbacher, Ralf-
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Ralph-
dc.contributor.authorGreinwald, Roland-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-13T11:40:02Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-13T11:40:02Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-23-
dc.identifier.citationKruis , W , Siegmund , B , Lesniakowski , K , Simanenkov , V , Khimion , L , Sobon , M , Delmans , G , Maksyashina , S V , Sablin , O A , Pokrotnieks , J , Mostovoy , Y , Datsenko , O , Abdulkhakov , S , Dorofeyev , A , Levchenko , O , Alexeeva , O , Andreev , P , Kolesnik , I P , Mihaly , E , Abrahamovych , O , Baluta , M , Kharchenko , N , Viacheslav , N , Uspenskiy , Y , Vieth , M , Mohrbacher , R , Mueller , R & Greinwald , R 2022 , ' Novel Budesonide Suppository and Standard Budesonide Rectal Foam Induce High Rates of Clinical Remission and Mucosal Healing in Active Ulcerative Proctitis : a Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trial ' , Journal of Crohn's & Colitis , vol. 16 , no. 11 , pp. 1714-1724 . https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac081-
dc.identifier.issn1873-9946-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.rsu.lv/jspui/handle/123456789/9838-
dc.descriptionPublisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation.-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND AIMS: Proctitis is the least extensive type of ulcerative colitis, for which rectal therapy is rarely studied and is underused. This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and patient's preference of a novel formulation of budesonide suppository 4 mg, compared with a commercially available budesonide rectal foam 2 mg, for the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis. METHODS: This was a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either budesonide 4 mg suppository or budesonide 2 mg foam once daily for 8 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were changes from baseline to Week 8 in clinical symptoms, for which clinical remission was defined as having a modified Ulcerative Colitis-Disease Activity Index [UC-DAI] subscore for stool frequency of 0 or 1 and a subscore for rectal bleeding of 0, and mucosal healing, defined as having a modified UC-DAI subscore for mucosal appearance of 0 or 1. Using a more stringent criterion, we additionally analysed deepened mucosal healing, which was defined as a mucosal appearance subscore of 0. Patient's preference, physician's global assessment, and quality of life were also assessed and analysed. RESULTS: Overall, 286 and 291 patients were included in the 4 mg suppository and 2 mg foam groups, respectively. Budesonide 4 mg suppository met the prespecified criterion for non-inferiority to the 2 mg foam in both co-primary endpoints of clinical remission and mucosal healing. Secondary endpoints consistently supported the non-inferiority of the suppository. Trends in favour of the suppository were observed in the subgroup of mesalazine non-responders. More patients reported a preference for the suppository over rectal foam. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ulcerative proctitis, budesonide 4 mg suppository was non-inferior to budesonide 2 mg foam in efficacy, and both were safe and well tolerated.en
dc.format.extent11-
dc.format.extent346096-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Crohn's & Colitis-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.subjectbudesonide-
dc.subjectClinical trials-
dc.subjectrectal foam-
dc.subjectrectal suppository-
dc.subjectulcerative proctitis-
dc.subject3.2 Clinical medicine-
dc.subject1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database-
dc.subjectGastroenterology-
dc.titleNovel Budesonide Suppository and Standard Budesonide Rectal Foam Induce High Rates of Clinical Remission and Mucosal Healing in Active Ulcerative Proctitis : a Randomised, Controlled, Non-inferiority Trialen
dc.type/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac081-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142940215&partnerID=8YFLogxK-
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed-
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Novel_Budesonide_Suppository.pdf337.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Openopen_acces_unlocked


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.