Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJilkine, Vladimir-
dc.contributor.otherMg. iur. Doctorant of Law, Counsel, Finland-
dc.identifier.citationSocrates: Rīgas Stradiņa universitātes Juridiskās fakultātes elektroniskais juridisko zinātnisko rakstu žurnāls. Rīga, RSU, 2015, Nr. 3 (3). 54.–65. lpp.-
dc.description.abstractThe article deals with the basis and procedure for review of court decisions that have entered into force, after the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights on violations of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in review of the cases by the Supreme Court of Finland, in connection with the decision by which the applicant appealed to The European Court of Human Rights. The author’s analysis and comparison of judicial practice and the European legal system shows that when making decisions, the Supreme Court applies current national constitutional and legislative provisions.en_US
dc.publisherRīgas Stradiņa universitāte-
dc.publisherRīga Stradiņš University-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSocrates 2015, 3 (3)-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.subjectEuropean Court of Human Rights-
dc.subjecthuman rights-
dc.subjectthe conviction-
dc.subjectthe international law-
dc.titleImplementation of International Legal Standards in the Revision of the Judgements that are in Force by Supreme Court of Finland-
Appears in Collections:Socrates. 2015, 3 (3)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
15-325_Socrates_3_2015_06_Jilkine_054-065_.pdf179.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Openopen_acces_unlocked

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons