Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.2478/prolas-2022-0057
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGlāzniece-Kagane, Zane-
dc.contributor.authorBērziņš, Arvīds-
dc.contributor.authorKagans, Aleksandrs-
dc.contributor.authorGrigorjevs, Sergejs-
dc.contributor.authorOzoliņa, Agnese-
dc.contributor.authorMamaja, Biruta-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-17T08:20:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-17T08:20:01Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-23-
dc.identifier.citationGlāzniece-Kagane , Z , Bērziņš , A , Kagans , A , Grigorjevs , S , Ozoliņa , A & Mamaja , B 2022 , ' Prediction of the Difficult Laryngoscopy with Ultrasound Measurements of Hyomental Distance ' , Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences. , vol. 76 , no. 3 , pp. 372-376 . https://doi.org/10.2478/prolas-2022-0057-
dc.identifier.issn2255-890X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.rsu.lv/jspui/handle/123456789/9789-
dc.description.abstractUltrasound measurement of hyomental distance is promising as a predictor for difficult laryngo-scopy in cases of difficult airway management. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognos-tic value of ultrasound measurement of hyomental distance (HMD) for prediction of difficultlaryngoscopy. Hyomental distance was sonographically measured in neutral (HMDn) and extremehead extension (HMDe) positions for fifty-six patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring tra-cheal intubation. Then the hyomental distance ratio (HMDR) was calculated. According to pres-ence of difficult laryngoscopy assessed by the Cormack–Lehane (CL) score, patients weredivided into a difficult laryngoscopy group (DL, n = 15) and easy laryngoscopy group (EL, n = 41).We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of HMDn, HMDe, and HMDR for difficult laryngo-scopy. DL was present in 15 (27%) patients. We found a significant intergroup difference inHMDR between the DL and EL groups (1.12 ± 0.04 vs. 1.24 ± 0.06, respectively;p< 0.001). Incontrast, we were not able to find a significant difference for HMDn and HMDr. HMDR had thehighest sensitivity 86.7% and specificity 85.4% (p< 0.01) to predict difficult laryngoscopy, wherethe area under the curve was 0.939;p< 0.01 for HDMR < 1.2 cm. Moreover, we found that diffi-cult laryngoscopy was associated with higher body mass index (BMI), with higher values in theDL group compared to EL patients (34.3 ± 9.1 vs. 28.5 ± 5.7 kg/m2, respectively;p= 0.035).HMDR < 1.2 cm measured by ultrasound might have a good predictive value for prediction of diffi-cult laryngoscopy.en
dc.format.extent5-
dc.format.extent540059-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.subjectairway ultrasound measurements-
dc.subjectdifficult intubation-
dc.subjectdirect laryngoscopy-
dc.subject3.2 Clinical medicine-
dc.subject1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database-
dc.titlePrediction of the Difficult Laryngoscopy with Ultrasound Measurements of Hyomental Distanceen
dc.type/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article-
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/prolas-2022-0057-
dc.contributor.institutionFaculty of Medicine-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://sciendo.com/es/article/10.2478/prolas-2022-0057-
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed-
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Prediction_of_the_difficult_laryngoscopy.pdf527.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Openopen_acces_unlocked


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.