Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.06.012
Title: Individual and collective protective responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 10 different countries : Results from the EUCLID online survey
Authors: Koller, Julia E.
Villinger, Karoline
Lages, Nadine C.
Absetz, Pilvikki
Bamert, Melanie
Branquinho, Cátia
Chaves-Avilés, Lourdes
Dimitropoulou, Panagiota
Fernández-Fernández, Ana Lucía
Gaspar de Matos, Margarida
Griskevica, Inguna
Gutiérrez-Doña, Benicio
Hankonen, Nelli
Inauen, Jennifer
Jordanova Peshevska, Dimitrinka
Kassianos, Angelos P.
Koļesņikova, Jeļena
Lavrič, Meta
Mitanovska, Tamara
Neter, Efrat
Poštuvan, Vita
Trups-Kalne, Ingrida
Vargas-Carmiol, Jorge
Schupp, Harald T.
Renner, Britta
Department of Health Psychology and Paedagogy
Psychology Laboratory
Keywords: Collective measures;Cross-amplification;Latvia;Protective behavior;Risk perception;3.3 Health sciences;1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database;Microbiology (medical);Infectious Diseases;SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Issue Date: Sep-2022
Citation: Koller , J E , Villinger , K , Lages , N C , Absetz , P , Bamert , M , Branquinho , C , Chaves-Avilés , L , Dimitropoulou , P , Fernández-Fernández , A L , Gaspar de Matos , M , Griskevica , I , Gutiérrez-Doña , B , Hankonen , N , Inauen , J , Jordanova Peshevska , D , Kassianos , A P , Koļesņikova , J , Lavrič , M , Mitanovska , T , Neter , E , Poštuvan , V , Trups-Kalne , I , Vargas-Carmiol , J , Schupp , H T & Renner , B 2022 , ' Individual and collective protective responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 10 different countries : Results from the EUCLID online survey ' , International Journal of Infectious Diseases , vol. 122 , pp. 356-364 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.06.012
Abstract: Background: In times of unprecedented infectious disease threats, it is essential to understand how to increase individual protective behaviors and support for collective measures. The present study therefore examines factors associated with individual and collective pathways. Methods: Data was collected through an online survey from 4483 participants (70.8% female, M = 41.2 years) across 10 countries from April 15, 2020 to June 2, 2020 as part of the "EUCLID" project (https://euclid.dbvis.de). Structural equation modeling was used to examine individual and collective pathways across and within countries. Results: Overall, the adoption of individual protective behaviors and support for collective measures were high. Risk perception on the individual level and perceived effectiveness at the collective level were positively associated with both individual protective behaviors and support for collective measures. Furthermore, the model explained considerable variance in individual (40.7%) and collective protective behaviors (40.8%) and was largely replicated across countries. Conclusions: The study extends previous research by demonstrating that individual risk perception and perceived effectiveness of collective measures jointly affect individual protective health behaviors and support for collective measures. These findings highlight the need to jointly consider a variety of behavioral actions against infectious disease threats, acknowledging interactions between individual and collective pathways.
Description: Funding Information: This study was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy – EXC 2117–422037984 (the Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour), and under FOR 2374 (RiskDynamics), and by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF, Federal Ministry of Education and Research) under 01EL1820A (SMARTACT). The funding sources had no involvement in the study's design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; the writing of the manuscript; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Funding Information: The authors have no competing interests to declare. The project was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Konstanz (ID number: 07/2020) and adhered to the guidelines of the German Psychological Society and the declaration of Helsinki. All participants gave written informed consent before their participation. We would like to thank Joke M. Debbeler, Hannah Oppenheimer, Isabel Brünecke, Kai D. Engel, Sofia Grieble, Leonie Hartmann, Peer C. Homann, Sarah Höschele, Anna Katz, Robin Kaufmann, Kim M. Koppe, Jennifer Martens, Vanessa C. Radtke, Friederike Roelcke, Sarah Rogula, Wiebke Schneider, Leonie Schuhmacher, Johanna Stähler and Nelly Theiss for their valuable support and Tony Arthur for proofreading the manuscript. This study was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy – EXC 2117–422037984 (the Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour), and under FOR 2374 (RiskDynamics), and by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF, Federal Ministry of Education and Research) under 01EL1820A (SMARTACT). The funding sources had no involvement in the study's design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; the writing of the manuscript; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Publisher Copyright: © 2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.06.012
ISSN: 1201-9712
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.