Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: China’s Voting Practice at the UN Security Council, Its Legal and Political Interpretation: Case of Syria
Authors: Reire, Gunda
Centre for International Studies, Latvia
Keywords: Socrates 2021, 2 (20);China;Security Council;Syria;United Nations;veto
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Citation: Reire, G. (2021). China’s Voting Practice at the UN Security Council, Its Legal and Political Interpretation: Case of Syria. Socrates. 2(20). 99–114.
Series/Report no.: Socrates 2021, 2 (20)
Abstract: This article examines intersection of three contemporary issues that occupy academic thought intensively: China’s global politics, its changing voting practice at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), and the international response to the civil war in Syria. The aim of the article is to provide quantitative and qualitative analysis of China’s voting practice in the UNSC regarding the civil war in Syria, to outline a legal and political interpretation of its voting patterns and to conceptualise China’s politics in the UNSC regarding this issue. The article argues that reasons behind China’s rapidly growing use of the veto in the UNSC regarding Syria are vaguely related to the case of Syria itself, but directly reflect the primacy of China’s domestic politics and its strategic aspirations to reshape global governance. Growing concern within the international community about the human rights abuses taking place on a mass scale against Uighurs in Xinjiang is the most prominent catalyst that enables and provokes China’s systemic reaction. Therefore, although China has neither geopolitical nor strategic interests in Syria, Syria’s case serves as a battleground for China’s attempts to transform the collectively accepted interpretation of multilateralism, democratic values, and norms. This aspect underlines the necessity to observe China’s politics from the perspective of social constructivism. Methodologically, this article draws on political discourse analysis theory, examines China’s arguments in the UNSC and argues that China’s voting behaviour in the UNSC regarding Syria focused on reinterpretation of two grand concepts of international law: state sovereignty and non-interference.
ISSN: 2256-0548
License URI:
Appears in Collections:Socrates. 2021, 2 (20)

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Socrates-20-2_08-Reire_099-114.pdf619.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Openopen_acces_unlocked

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons