Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.3390/medicina55070394
Title: The Influence of Bowel Preparation on ADC Measurements: Comparison between Conventional DWI and DWIBS Sequences
Authors: Apine, Ilze
Baduna, Monta
Pitura, Reinis
Pokrotnieks, Juris
Krumina, Gaida
Department of Radiology
Rīga Stradiņš University
Department of Internal Diseases
Keywords: MR enterography;MRE;diffusion-weighted imaging;DWI;DWIBS;ADC;3.2 Clinical medicine;1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database
Issue Date: Jul-2019
Citation: Apine , I , Baduna , M , Pitura , R , Pokrotnieks , J & Krumina , G 2019 , ' The Influence of Bowel Preparation on ADC Measurements: Comparison between Conventional DWI and DWIBS Sequences ' , Medicina (Kaunas) , vol. 55 , no. 7 , 394 . https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55070394
Abstract: Background and objectives: The aim of the study was to assess whether there were di ff erences between apparent di ff usion coe ffi cient (ADC) values of di ff usion-weighted imaging (DWI) and di ff usion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) sequences in non-prepared and prepared bowels before and after preparation with an enteric hyperosmolar agent, to assess whether ADC measurements have the potential to avoid bowel preparation and whether ADC-DWIBS has advantages over ADC-DWI. Materials and Methods: 106 adult patients without evidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) underwent magnetic resonance (MR) enterography before and after bowel preparation. ADC-DWI and ADC-DWIBS values were measured in the intestinal and colonic walls demonstrating high signal intensity (SI) at DWI tracking images of b = 800 s /mm2 before and after preparation. Results: There were significant di ff erence (p < 0.0001) in both ADC-DWI and ADC-DWIBS results between non-prepared and prepared jejunum for DWI being 1.09 x 10 3 mm2 /s and 1.76 x 10 3 mm2 /s, respectively, and for DWIBS being 0.91 x 10 3 mm2 /s and 1.75 x 10 3 mm2 /s, respectively. Both ADC-DWI and DWIBS also showed significant di ff erence between non-prepared and prepared colon (p < 0.0001), with DWI values 1.41 x 10 3 mm2 /s and 2.13 x 10 3 mm2 /s, and DWIBS-1.01 x 10 3mm2 /s and 2.04 x 10 3mm2 /s, respectively. Nosignificant di ff erence between ADC-DWI and ADC-DWIBS was found in prepared jejunum (p = 0.84) and prepared colon (p = 0.58), whereas a significant di ff erence was found in non-prepared jejunum and non-prepared colon (p = 0.0001 in both samples). Conclusions: ADC between DWI and DWIBS does not di ff er in prepared bowel walls but demonstrates a di ff erence in non-prepared bowel. ADC in non-prepared bowel is lower than in prepared bowel and possible overlap with the ADC range of IBD is possible in non-prepared bowel. ADC-DWIBS has no advantage over ADC-DWI in regard to IBD assessment.
DOI: 10.3390/medicina55070394
ISSN: 1010-660X
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
The_Influence_of_Bowel_Preparation_on_ADC.pdf2.82 MBAdobe PDFView/Openopen_acces_unlocked


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.