Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.1051/shsconf/20184002012
Title: Physiotherapy following cardiac surgery : Program comparison
Authors: Pulmane, D.
Vetra, A.
Lacis, R.
Driba, D.
Berķis, Uldis
Vilka, Lolita
Rīga Stradiņš University
Department of Rehabilitation
Keywords: 3.2 Clinical medicine;3.3 Health sciences;3.1. Articles or chapters in proceedings/scientific books indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: EDP Sciences
Citation: Pulmane , D , Vetra , A , Lacis , R & Driba , D 2018 , Physiotherapy following cardiac surgery : Program comparison . in U Berķis & L Vilka (eds) , SHS Web of Conferences : 6th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference SOCIETY. HEALTH. WELFARE . vol. 40 , 02012 , SHS Web of Conferences , EDP Sciences , 6th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference "Society. Health. Welfare" , Riga , Latvia , 23/11/16 . https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184002012
conference
Series/Report no.: SHS Web of Conferences
Abstract: The objective is to examine and compare the usability of two physiotherapy programmes, analyzing respiratory function in patients before and after cardiac surgery in hospital during seven postoperative days (POD). Quantitative randomized prospective study of 157 patients before and after the valve replacement surgery, coronary artery bypass graft and combined surgeries, who moved independently. Participants were randomized into two groups (1 and 2) with different physiotherapy programmes. The routine physiotherapy of breath-enhancing techniques, micro-circulation improvement were used for the first group, for the second group - modified physiotherapy - the improvement of inspiration muscles, mm. quadriceps. gluteus max strength. Anthropometric measurements were defined for both groups on the day before surgery and during spirography - dynamic indicators - forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the 2nd second (FEV1), Tiffeneau index (FEV1/VC (%)), peak expiratory flow (PEF), operation parameters. By comparing the postoperative respiratory parameters between the two groups and using independent samples t test, it was found out that the difference in FVC between groups is 1.71 [95% CI: -8.25 to 4.8] and it is not statistically significant (t (155) = -0.52; p = 0.60). Based on the Leuven test results FVC the distribution variance is not statistically notably different for group 1 and group 2 (F = 0.27, p = 0.60). Using routine and modified physiotherapy and comparing postoperative dynamic respiratory performance of the two groups, there was no statistically significant difference, proving that the two models are equally effective.
DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20184002012
ISBN: 978-2-7598-9029-3
ISSN: 2261-2424
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Physiotherapy_following_cardiac_surgery.pdf478.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Openopen_acces_unlocked


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.