Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225995
Title: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) : Investigating care practices pointed out to disparities in diagnosis and treatment across European Union
Authors: European Network on ME/CFS (EUROMENE)
Krumina, Angelika
Murovska, Modra
Berkis, Uldis
Nora-Krukle, Zaiga
Rasa, Santa
Rīga Stradiņš University
Keywords: 3.2 Clinical medicine;1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database;General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology;General Agricultural and Biological Sciences;General
Issue Date: 1-Dec-2019
Citation: European Network on ME/CFS (EUROMENE) , Krumina , A , Murovska , M , Berkis , U , Nora-Krukle , Z & Rasa , S 2019 , ' Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) : Investigating care practices pointed out to disparities in diagnosis and treatment across European Union ' , PLoS ONE , vol. 14 , no. 12 , e0225995 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225995
Abstract: ME/CFS is a chronic, complex, multisystem disease that often limits the health and functioning of the affected patients. Diagnosing patients with ME/CFS is a challenge, and many different case definitions exist and are used in clinical practice and research. Even after diagnosis, medical treatment is very challenging. Symptom relief and coping may affect how patients live with their disease and their quality of life. There is no consensus on which diagnostic criteria should be used and which treatment strategies can be recommended for patients. The purpose of the current project was to map the landscape of the Euromene countries in respect of national guidelines and recommendations for case definition, diagnosis and clinical approaches for ME/CFS patients. A 23 items questionnaire was sent out by email to the members of Euromene. The form contained questions on existing guidelines for case definitions, treatment/management of the disease, tests and questionnaires applied, and the prioritization of information for data sampling in research. We obtained information from 17 countries. Five countries reported having national guidelines for diagnosis, and five countries reported having guidelines for clinical approaches. For diagnostic purposes, the Fukuda criteria were most often recommended, and also the Canadian Consensus criteria, the International Consensus Criteria and the Oxford criteria were used. A mix of diagnostic criteria was applied within those countries having no guidelines. Many different questionnaires and tests were used for symptom registration and diagnostic investigation. For symptom relief, pain and anti-depressive medication were most often recommended. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Graded Exercise treatment were often recommended as disease management and rehabilitative/palliative strategies. The lack of consistency in recommendations across European countries urges the development of regulations, guidance and standards. The results of this study will contribute to the harmonization of diagnostic criteria and treatment for ME/CFS in Europe.
Description: Funding Information: Funding: EUROMENE Network was funded by the COoperation in Science and Technology (COST) program from Utopian Commission (COST#15111). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Publisher Copyright: Copyright: © 2019 Strand et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225995
ISSN: 1932-6203
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.