Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.1684/ejd.2020.3872
Title: Inequalities in the patterns of dermoscopy use and training across Europe : conclusions of the Eurodermoscopy pan-European survey
Authors: Eurodermoscopy Working Group
Forsea, Ana Maria
Tschandl, Philipp
Zalaudek, Iris
Karls, Raimonds
Keywords: dermoscopy;disparities;Eastern Europe;skin cancer;training;Western Europe;3.2 Clinical medicine;1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database;Dermatology;SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being;SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
Issue Date: Sep-2020
Citation: Eurodermoscopy Working Group , Forsea , A M , Tschandl , P , Zalaudek , I & Karls , R 2020 , ' Inequalities in the patterns of dermoscopy use and training across Europe : conclusions of the Eurodermoscopy pan-European survey ' , European Journal of Dermatology , vol. 30 , no. 5 , pp. 524-531 . https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2020.3872
Abstract: Background: Dermoscopy is a widely used technique, recommended in clinical practice guidelines worldwide for the early diagnosis of skin cancers. Intra-European disparities are reported for early detection and prognosis of skin cancers, however, no information exists about regional variation in patterns of dermoscopy use across Europe. Objective: To evaluate the regional differences in patterns of dermoscopy use and training among European dermatologists. Materials & Methods: An online survey of European-registered dermatologists regarding dermoscopy training, practice and attitudes was established. Answers from Eastern (EE) versus Western European (WE) countries were compared and their correlation with their respective countries’ gross domestic product/capita (GDPc) and total and government health expenditure/capita (THEc and GHEc) was analysed. Results: We received 4,049 responses from 14 WE countries and 3,431 from 18 EE countries. A higher proportion of WE respondents reported dermoscopy use (98% vs. 77%, p<0.001) and training during residency (43% vs. 32%) or anytime (96.5% vs. 87.6%) (p<0.001) compared to EE respondents. The main obstacles in dermoscopy use were poor access to dermoscopy equipment in EE and a lack of confidence in one’s skills in WE. GDPc, THEc and GHEc correlated with rate of dermoscopy use and dermoscopy training during residency (Spearman rho: 0.5–0.7, p<0.05), and inversely with availability of dermoscopy equipment. Conclusion: The rates and patterns of dermoscopy use vary significantly between Western and Eastern Europe, on a background of economic inequality. Regionally adapted interventions to increase access to dermoscopy equipment and training might enhance the use of this technique towards improving the early detection of skin cancers.
Description: Publisher Copyright: © 2020, JLE/Springer.
DOI: 10.1684/ejd.2020.3872
ISSN: 1167-1122
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.