Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
10.51870/RNCC4980
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Andžāns, Māris | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-28T07:40:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-28T07:40:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-06-21 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Andžāns , M 2023 , ' Small Powers, Geopolitical Crisis and Hypersecuritisation : Latvia and the Effects of Russia’s Second War in Ukraine ' , Central European Journal of International and Security Studies , vol. 17 , no. 2 , pp. 138-162 . https://doi.org/10.51870/RNCC4980 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1802-548X | - |
dc.identifier.other | Mendeley: 0beab6cb-bf79-3a80-8844-576d84909595 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.rsu.lv/jspui/handle/123456789/12630 | - |
dc.description | Funding Information: The author is grateful to the Academy of International Affairs NRW during whose fellowship this article was completed. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 CEJISS. Article is distributed under Open Access licence: Attribution - NonCommercial 4.0 Unported (cc by-nc 4.0) | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article presents a case where securitisation of one state in another increased dramatically and exponentially. The scale and intensity of securitisation were unprecedented, as were the range of securitisation actors, and the tone of language of speech acts and nonverbal securitisation acts. This case in question is the securitisation of Russia in Latvia over Russia’s war in Ukraine starting in 2022. Although Russia was securitised by its smaller neighbour before the war, the sudden explosion of securitisation in 2022 differs from any securitisation in recent decades there. Securitisation of Russia is evaluated within the margins of the hypersecuritisation subconcept that purports securitisation beyond the ‘normal’ level, characterised by exaggeration of threats and excessive countermeasures. This article offers a reformulation of the subconcept, omitting the negative connotation built into the initial definition, as well as addresses the transition from securitisation to hypersecuritisation. | en |
dc.format.extent | 584749 | - |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Central European Journal of International and Security Studies | - |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | - |
dc.subject | hypersecuritisation | - |
dc.subject | securitisation | - |
dc.subject | Latvia | - |
dc.subject | Russia | - |
dc.subject | Ukraine | - |
dc.subject | 5.6 Political science | - |
dc.subject | 1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database | - |
dc.title | Small Powers, Geopolitical Crisis and Hypersecuritisation : Latvia and the Effects of Russia’s Second War in Ukraine | en |
dc.type | /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.51870/RNCC4980 | - |
dc.contributor.institution | Rīga Stradiņš University | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163861303&partnerID=8YFLogxK | - |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
Small_Powers_Geopolitical_Crisis_and_Hypersecuritisation.pdf | 571.04 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open![]() |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.