Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056753
Title: WHO Standards-based questionnaire to measure health workers' perspective on the quality of care around the time of childbirth in the WHO European region : development and mixed-methods validation in six countries
Authors: Valente, Emanuelle Pessa
IMAgiNE EURO study group
Pumpure, Elizabete
Rezeberga, Dace
Vaska, Agnija
Jakovicka, Dārta
Rudzīte, Paula
Ērmane, Elīna
Vilcāne, Katrīna Paula
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Faculty of Medicine
Keywords: COVID-19;Female;Humans;Infant, Newborn;Pregnancy;Psychometrics;Quality of Health Care;Reproducibility of Results;Surveys and Questionnaires;World Health Organization;3.2 Clinical medicine;1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database;SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Issue Date: 8-Apr-2022
Citation: Valente , E P , IMAgiNE EURO study group , Pumpure , E , Rezeberga , D , Vaska , A , Jakovicka , D , Rudzīte , P , Ērmane , E & Vilcāne , K P 2022 , ' WHO Standards-based questionnaire to measure health workers' perspective on the quality of care around the time of childbirth in the WHO European region : development and mixed-methods validation in six countries ' , BMJ Open , vol. 12 , no. 4 , pp. e056753 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056753
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Develop and validate a WHO Standards-based online questionnaire to measure the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth from the health workers' perspective. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study. SETTING: Six countries of the WHO European Region. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: The questionnaire is based on lessons learnt in previous studies, and was developed in three sequential phases: (1) WHO Quality Measures were prioritised and content, construct and face validity were assessed through a Delphi involving a multidisciplinary board of experts from 11 countries of the WHO European Region; (2) translation/back translation of the English version was conducted following The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research guidelines; (3) internal consistency, intrarater reliability and acceptability were assessed among 600 health workers in six countries. RESULTS: The questionnaire included 40 items based on WHO Standards Quality Measures, equally divided into four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of human and physical resources, organisational changes due to COVID-19; and its organised in six sections. It was translated/back translated in 12 languages: Bosnian, Croatian, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish. The Cronbach's alpha values were ≥0.70 for each questionnaire section where questions were hypothesised to be interrelated, indicating good internal consistence. Cohen K or Gwet's AC1 values were ≥0.60, suggesting good intrarater reliability, except for one question. Acceptability was good with only 1.70% of health workers requesting minimal changes in question wording. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the questionnaire has good content, construct, face validity, internal consistency, intrarater reliability and acceptability in six countries of the WHO European Region. Future studies may further explore the questionnaire's use in other countries, and how to translate evidence generated by this tool into policies to improve the QMNC. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04847336.
Description: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056753
ISSN: 2044-6055
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
WHO_Standards_based_questionnaire.pdf594.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Openopen_acces_unlocked


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.