Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.1136/gut.2008.154302
Title: Once daily versus three times daily mesalazine granules in active ulcerative colitis : A double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, non-inferiority trial
Authors: Kruis, W.
Kiudelis, G.
Rácz, I.
Gorelov, A.
Pokrotnieks, J.
Horynski, M.
Batovsky, M.
Kykal, J.
Boehm, S.
Greinwald, R.
Mueller, R.
Keywords: 3.2 Clinical medicine;1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database;Gastroenterology
Issue Date: Feb-2009
Citation: Kruis , W , Kiudelis , G , Rácz , I , Gorelov , A , Pokrotnieks , J , Horynski , M , Batovsky , M , Kykal , J , Boehm , S , Greinwald , R & Mueller , R 2009 , ' Once daily versus three times daily mesalazine granules in active ulcerative colitis : A double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, non-inferiority trial ' , Gut , vol. 58 , no. 2 , pp. 233-240 . https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2008.154302
Abstract: Objectives: To determine the therapeutic equivalence and safety of once daily (OD) versus three times daily (TID) dosing of a total daily dose of 3 g Salofalk (mesalazine) granules in patients with active ulcerative colitis. Design: A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, multicentre, international, phase III noninferiority study. Setting: 54 centres in 13 countries. Patients: 380 patients with confirmed diagnosis of established or first attack of ulcerative colitis (clinical activity index (CAI)>4 and endoscopic index ≥ 4 at baseline) were randomised and treated. Interventions: 8-week treatment with either 3 g OD or 1 g TID mesalazine granules. Main outcome measures: Clinical remission (CAI ≤ 4) at study end. Results: 380 patients were evaluable for efficacy and safety by intention-to-treat (ITT); 345 for per protocol (PP) analysis. In the ITT population, 79.1% in the OD group (n = 191) and 75.7% in the TID group (n = 189) achieved clinical remission (p<0.0001 for non-inferiority). Significantly more patients with proctosigmoiditis achieved clinical remission in the OD group (86%; n = 97) versus the TID group (73%; n = 100; p = 0.0298). About 70% of patients in both treatment groups achieved endoscopic remission, and 35% in the OD group and 41% in the TID group achieved histological remission. About 80% of all patients preferred OD dosing. Similar numbers of adverse events occurred in 55 patients (28.8%) in the OD group and in 61 patients (32.3%) in the TID group, indicating that the two dosing regimens were equally safe and well tolerated. Conclusions: OD 3 g mesalazine granules are as effective and safe as a TID 1 g schedule. With respect to the best possible adherence of patients to the treatment, OD dosing of mesalazine should be the preferred application mode in active ulcerative colitis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00449722.
Description: A list of investigators of the International Salofalk OD Study Group is given in the appendix. Investigators from Latvia are: Jelena Derova, Aleksejs Derovs, Juris Pokrotnieks, Aldis Pukitis, Mairita Ergle.
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2008.154302
ISSN: 0017-5749
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.