Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.17770/sie2020vol6.5183
Title: Kaloriju patēriņa noteikšanas atšķirības uz veloergometra un mobilajās lietotnēs
Other Titles: Differences about Calorie Intake Measurement Across Fitness Device and Mobile Apps
Authors: Arnis, Voldemārs
Buliņa, Ramona
Veseta, Una
Upeniece, Irēna
Vīnberga, Indra
Lubkina, Velta
Kaupužs, Aivars
Znotiņa, Daina
Rīga Stradiņš University
Keywords: calorie intake, ergometer, mobile app.;3.3 Health sciences;3.1. Articles or chapters in proceedings/scientific books indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: Rēzeknes Tehnoloģiju akadēmija
Citation: Arnis , V , Buliņa , R , Veseta , U , Upeniece , I & Vīnberga , I 2020 , Kaloriju patēriņa noteikšanas atšķirības uz veloergometra un mobilajās lietotnēs . in V Lubkina , A Kaupužs & D Znotiņa (eds) , Sabiedrība. Integrācija. Izglītība = Society. Integration. Education : starptautiskās zinātniskās konferences materiāli = proceedings of the international scientific conference . vol. 6 , Society. Integration. Education=Sabiedrība. Integrācija. Izglītība , Rēzeknes Tehnoloģiju akadēmija , Rēzekne , pp. 66-78 , International Scientific Conference “Society. Integration. Education: Sabiedrība. Integrācija. Izglītība”, 2020 , Rēzekne , Latvia , 22/05/20 . https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol6.5183
conference
Series/Report no.: Society. Integration. Education=Sabiedrība. Integrācija. Izglītība
Abstract: Various technologies are increasingly used in sports and fitness classes. Portable fitness devices are the fastest growing fitness trend worldwide in the recent years (Thompson, 2019). More and more people are using fitness bracelets, smart watches, GPS tracking devices and fitness apps on mobile phones. One of the most commonly used functions in both portable fitness devices and stationarytechnology is the measurement of calories intake. The simplest, most convenient, and cheapest way to measure calorie intake (CI) is smart devices and custom mobile apps (Ramirez, 2018) that store and process data. However, not all of these devices are accurate and objective enough.Aim of the study: to find out and evaluate the calorie intake of a bicycle ergometer and various mobile apps under different physical loads.CI at various physical loads was determined using the MONARK ERGOMEDIC 839E cycling and applications. Comparing the measurement difference between the apps and the ergometer, it was found that the lowest load difference was for all apps, the least difference was for the POLAR app and the highest was for the SAMSUNG app, and the mid to higher load for the SAMSUNG app. App calorie intake figures are closer to those of the ergometer at peak load.
DOI: 10.17770/sie2020vol6.5183
ISSN: 1691-5887
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
KALORIJU_PAT_RI_A_NOTEIK_ANAS_AT_IR_BAS.pdf305.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Openopen_acces_unlocked


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.