Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.1186/s12955-021-01863-0
Title: Comparison of content and psychometric properties for assessment tools used for brain tumor patients : a scoping review
Authors: Ģiga, Lelde
Pētersone, Anete
Čakstiņa, Silva
Bērziņa, Guna
Rīga Stradiņš University
Department of Rehabilitation
Keywords: Brain Tumor;Disability and Health (ICF);International Classification of Functioning;Linking;Outcome measures;Psychometric properties;3.3 Health sciences;1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database;Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health;SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Issue Date: 9-Oct-2021
Citation: Ģiga , L , Pētersone , A , Čakstiņa , S & Bērziņa , G 2021 , ' Comparison of content and psychometric properties for assessment tools used for brain tumor patients : a scoping review ' , Health and Quality of Life Outcomes , vol. 19 , no. 1 , 234 , pp. 234 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01863-0
Abstract: Aims: To determine the most frequently utilized functional status assessment instruments for patients with brain tumors, compare their contents, using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), and their psychometric properties. Methods: A scoping review was conducted to explore possible assessment instruments and summarize the evidence. A systematic literature search was performed for identification of the frequently used functional assessment tool in clinical trials in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest databases. The content of most used instruments was linked to the ICF categories. The psychometric qualities of these assessment tools were systematically searched and analyzed. Results: Nine most used assessment tools in clinical trials were identified. The most frequently used assessment instrument is the Karnofsky Performance Scale, which is developed for a general assessment of oncological patients. Out of four self-assessment tools, two were disease-specific (EORTC QLQ-BN20 and FACT-Br), EORTC QLQ-C30 has been shown good psychometric properties in patients with brain tumors as well as in patients with various oncological diseases, similar to the SF-36, it is used in patients with brain tumors as well as in patients with various diseases. The Functional Independence Measure and the Barthel Index were two objective assessment tools that described functioning, but two were neuropsychological tests (MMSE and Trial Making Test). Two hundred eighty-three meaningful concepts were identified and linked to 102 most relevant second-level categories covering all components of the ICF. Forty-nine studies reporting psychometric properties of those nine assessment tools were identified, indicating good reliability and validity for all the instruments. Conclusion: Nine most frequently utilized functional status assessment instruments for patients with brain tumors represent all components of the ICF and have good psychometric properties. However, the choice of the tool depends on the clinical question posed and the aim of its use.
Description: Funding Information: This study was supported by Riga Stradiņš University internal grant. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).
DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01863-0
ISSN: 1477-7525
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.