The mass : A neglected plastic sign of sculpture
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2019-12-01
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
By and large visual semiotics still misses a comprehensive method for the analysis of sculp-ture. The paper demonstrates that sculptures have a peculiar plastic sign – the mass. Intrinsic to three-dimensional objects, the mass determines the forces of gravity and inertia possess-ing a potential to suggest connotations of the artwork. Taking as examples the large monu-ments built in Soviet Latvia in 1960-1990, the paper distinguishes among three categories of monuments – static, dynamic and ambiguous – which owe their particular characteristics to diverse exposure of the mass enabled by various constructive techniques. As iconic signs these monuments represent actual identities and events while the exposed mass, as a plas-tic sign, conveys additional connotations like stability, change, motion, standstill, slowness, speed enabling a more nuanced interpretation of the represented persons and events. As a physical property of objects mass can be evaluated by handling them directly but the public is supposed to look at sculpture not to touch and handle it. The current psychology of per-ception holds however that the perceiver goes beyond the in formation given in the visual input, the process of perception depends also on the perceiver’s knowledge and purposes in the contact with reality. Ubiquity of outdoor sculpture suggests that our accumulated expe-rience of 3D artistic objects can be embedded into the elaboration of the visual input thus the viewers can perceive the mass and enrich the interpretation of sculpture considering the meanings of this plastic sign
Description
Keywords
Sculpture, Three-dimensional Objects, Tectonics, Plastic Sign, Mass, Visual Semiotics, Soviet Latvia, 5.8 Media and Communication, 1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database
Citation
Kruk, S 2019, 'The mass : A neglected plastic sign of sculpture', Punctum International Journal of Semiotics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 91-118. https://doi.org/10.18680/hss.2019.0025