Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.1515/prolas-2017-0047
Title: Preferences of patients for discussing sudden unexpected death in epilepsy
Authors: Suna, Normunds
Gutmane, Evija
Lazdane, Madara
Karelis, Guntis
Folkmanis, Valdis
Rīga Stradiņš University
Keywords: Awareness;Epilepsy;SUDEP;3.2 Clinical medicine;3.3 Health sciences;1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database;General
Issue Date: Aug-2017
Citation: Suna , N , Gutmane , E , Lazdane , M , Karelis , G & Folkmanis , V 2017 , ' Preferences of patients for discussing sudden unexpected death in epilepsy ' , Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences, Section B: Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences , vol. 71 , no. 4 , pp. 280-285 . https://doi.org/10.1515/prolas-2017-0047
Abstract: People with epilepsy have increased mortality rates, which is partially attributed to sudden unexpected death in epilepsy syndrome (SUDEP). Poor seizure control appears to be the strongest SUDEP risk factor. Management of epilepsy and adherence to therapy is critical to seizure control. The belief by caregivers of negative influence caused by being informed about the syndrome is the main reason SUDEP is not disclosed. There are no clear recommendations when to disclose the risk of SUDEP and how much information should be provided. We addressed the preferences of Latvian epilepsy patients for discussing SUDEP as well as awareness of the syndrome. Our study involved 55 epilepsy patients. We found that, as in other studies, our patients were relatively well informed about SUDEP. We found that a considerable proportion of patients preferred to receive information about SUDEP from a general practitioner. We note the belief of patients that the disclosure of SUDEP would either improve or have no effect on the quality of life. We were able to identify groups of patients with a self-reported belief of more frequent expected anxiety and poor adherence to medical treatment. Our data improves the understanding of preferences of patient for discussing the negative aspects of epilepsy.
Description: Funding Information: The study was approved by the Medical and Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of the Riga East Clinical University Hospital. Publisher Copyright: © 2017 De Gruyter Open Ltd. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1515/prolas-2017-0047
ISSN: 1407-009X
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
PREFERENCES_OF_PATIENTS_FOR_DISCUSSING.pdf83.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Openopen_acces_unlocked


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.