Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.21101/cejph.a3893
Title: Monitoring of congenital anomalies in Latvia
Authors: Zīle, Irisa
Villeruša, Anita
Gissler, Mika
Rīga Stradiņš University
Department of Public Health and Epidemiology
Keywords: Congenital anomalies at birth;Medical birth register;Monitoring system;Prevalence;3.3 Health sciences;1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database;Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health;SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Issue Date: 2014
Citation: Zīle , I , Villeruša , A & Gissler , M 2014 , ' Monitoring of congenital anomalies in Latvia ' , Central European Journal of Public Health , vol. 22 , no. 3 , pp. 147-152 . https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a3893
Abstract: Objective: This study provides a description and analysis of characteristics of the monitoring system for congenital anomalies at birth and prevalence trends in Latvia using retrospective analysis of congenital anomalies at birth with cross-sectional data on prevalence (national data from Latvia, 2000-2010). Methods: There are three main monitoring systems on congenital anomalies among newborns and infants: the Medical Birth Register with data on live births with one or more congenital anomalies at birth, the Register on Congenital Anomalies with genetically approved cases for live births and the National Causes of Death Register with data on stillbirths. Methodological problems were analysed by calculating different prevalence rates. The main outcome measures are as follows: prevalence rate, live birth prevalence rate, major congenital anomalies live birth prevalence rate, and stillbirth rate. Results: The live birth period prevalence was 319.7/10,000 live births, and the major congenital anomalies live birth prevalence was 211.4/10,000. The period total prevalence rate of births was 323.7/10,000 live births and stillbirths. The stillbirth rate due to congenital anomalies was 6.1/10,000 live and stillbirths. The live birth prevalence with congenital anomalies decreased slightly from the year 2000 to the year 2010. Conclusions: The present system of congenital anomaly registration requires improvements for better completeness. Latvia should use the experience of Nordic countries and introduce a mother’s and children’s identification number to the Medical Birth Register. It would be helpful to link the information from hospitals and perinatal centres together to validate the congenital anomaly diagnoses of newborns after their discharge from the maternity unit. The monitoring system should also include information on pregnancies with congenital anomalies which do not end in birth, especially terminations of pregnancy.
Description: Publisher Copyright: © 2014, Czech National Institute of Public Health. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.21101/cejph.a3893
ISSN: 1210-7778
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
MONITORING_OF_CONGENITAL_ANOMALIES.pdf616.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Openopen_acces_unlocked


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.