Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1178654
Title: Variations in National Surveillance Reporting for Mpox Virus : A Comparative Analysis in 32 Countries
Authors: Panag, Deepkanwar Singh
Jain, Nityanand
Katagi, Dimitra
De Jesus Cipriano Flores, Gabriela
Dias Silva Dutra Macedo, Grabriela
Rodrigo Diaz Villa, Gonzalo
Yeche, Mathieu
Yusveni Velazquez Merida, Saydi
Kapparath, Sreerag
Sert, Zilfi
Reinis, Aigars
Faculty of Medicine
Keywords: surveillance;case definitions;differences;reporting;mpox;monkeypox;epidemiology;3.3 Health sciences;1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database;Epidemiology;SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals;SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Issue Date: 18-Apr-2023
Citation: Panag , D S , Jain , N , Katagi , D , De Jesus Cipriano Flores , G , Dias Silva Dutra Macedo , G , Rodrigo Diaz Villa , G , Yeche , M , Yusveni Velazquez Merida , S , Kapparath , S , Sert , Z & Reinis , A 2023 , ' Variations in National Surveillance Reporting for Mpox Virus : A Comparative Analysis in 32 Countries ' , Frontiers in Public Health , vol. 11 , 1178654 , pp. 01-14 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1178654
Abstract: Objectives: Case Reporting and Surveillance (CRS) are crucial to combat the global spread of the Monkeypox virus (Mpox). To support CRS, the World Health Organization (WHO) has released standardized case definitions for suspected, probable, confirmed, and discarded cases. However, these definitions are often subject to localized adaptations by countries leading to heterogeneity in the collected data. Herein, we compared the differences in Mpox case definitions in 32 countries that collectively reported 96% of the global Mpox caseload. Methods: We extracted information regarding Mpox case definitions issued by the competent authorities in 32 included countries for suspected, probable, confirmed, and discarded cases. All data were gathered from online public sources. Results: For confirmed cases, 18 countries (56%) followed WHO guidelines and tested for Mpox using species specific PCR and/or sequencing. For probable and suspected cases, seven and eight countries, respectively were found to have not released definitions in their national documentations. Furthermore, none of the countries completely matched WHO’s criteria for probable and suspected cases. Overlapping amalgamations of the criteria were frequently noticed. Regarding discarded cases, only 13 countries (41%) reported definitions, with only two countries (6%) having definition consistent with WHO guidelines. For case reporting, 12 countries (38%) were found to report both probable and confirmed cases, in line with WHO requirements. Conclusion: The heterogeneity in case definitions and reporting highlights the pressing need for homogenization in implementation of these guidelines. Homogenization would drastically improve data quality and aid data-scientists, epidemiologists, and clinicians to better understand and model the true disease burden in the society, followed by formulation and implementation of targeted interventions to curb the virus spread.
Description: Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2023 Singh Panag, Jain, Katagi, Jesus Cipriano Flores, Silva Dutra Macedo, Rodrigo Díaz Villa, Yèche, Velázquez Mérida, Kapparath, Sert and Reinis.
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1178654
ISSN: 2296-2565
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.