Focused open necrosectomy in treatment of necrotic pancreatitis - RAKUS "Gaiļezers" experience and comparison with other methods
Notiek ielāde...
Datums
Autori
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīga Stradiņš University
Kopsavilkums
Atslēgas vārdi. Tēmēta atvērta nekrektomija (FON), nekrotisks pankreatīts.
Mērķis. Nekrotisks pankreatīts ir viena no smagākajām smaga akūta pankreatīta formām ar relatīvi augstu mirstību - 15 - 32% (World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 2019). FON ir minimāli invazīva ķirurģiska ārstēšanas metode, kura pirmo reizi tika veikta Rīgas Austrumu klīniskajā universitātes slimnīcā (RAKUS) 2008.gadā. Pētījuma mērķis bija izvērtēt FON - mortalitāti, komplikācijas (pankreatokutāna fistula, zarnu fistula un asiņošana), hospitalizācijas laiku (kopējais hospitalizācijas laiks un laiks intensīvās terapijas palātā), operācijas ilgumu, reoperācijas nepieciešamību un pacientu stāvokļa smagumu pirms operācijas, un salīdzināt ar konvenciālu ķirurģisku nekrektomiju (CON), kura bija primārā ārstēšanas metode nekrotiskam pankreatītām RAKUS pirms FON.
Materiāli un metodes. Retrospektīvs pētījums par pacietiem, kuriem tika veikta FON laika posmā no 2016. līdz 2019. gadam. Dati tika ievākti no pacientu medicīniskajām vēsturēm.
Rezultāti. Kopumā 43 pavientiem tika veikta FON. Vidējais vecums bija 49,5 gadi (29 - 79 g.). Intrahospitālā mortalitāte salīdzinot ar CON bija 7% (3 pacienti) vs 9,3% (9pacienti). Komplikācijas tika novērotas 11 pacientiem (25,6%) vs 29 pacientiem (30%) CON grupā. 4 pacientiem bija zarnu fistula (9,3%), 6 - pankreatokutāna fistula (14%), 1 - asiņošana (2,3%). Vidējais hospitalizācijas laiks bija 38,5 dienas vs 69 dienas CON grupā, vidējais laiks intensīvās terapijas palātā 16,6 dienas (0 - 117 dienas) vs 21 diena CON grupā. Vidējais procedūras laiks bija 71,3 minūtes (25 - 135 min) vs 120 min CON grupā. 17 pacientiem (39,5%) bija nepieciešama atkārtota operācija vs 64 (65,3%) pacientiem CON grupā. 22 pacientiem (51,1%) pirms operācijas bija sepse. Nekrozes apjoms netika pētīts datu trūkuma dēļ.
Secinājumi. FON var tikt izmantots nekrotiska pankreatīta ārstēšanai dēļ relatīvi zemas mortalitātes, zemāka komplikāciju apjoma, īsākas hospitalizācijas, kā arī zemākas nepieciešamības pēc reoperācijas.
Keywords. Focused open necrosectomy (FON), necrotic pancreatitis. Objectives. Necrotic pancreatitis is one of the most severe acute pancreatitis forms with relatively high mortality 15 – 32% (World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 2019). FON is minimally invasive surgical treatment method which firstly was done in Riga East Clinical University Hospital (RECUH) in 2008.Aim of this study was to evaluate FON – mortality, complications (pancreocutaneous fistula, intestinal fistula and bleeding), hospitalisation time (total time and time in intensive care unit), length of surgery, need for reoperation and patient severity before surgery (amount of necrosis, development of sepsis before surgery) and compare with conventional surgical necrosectomy (CON) which was primary treatment method of necrotizing pancreatitis in RECUH before FON. Materials and Methods.Retrospective study of patients who underwent FON from 2016 till 2019. Data were collected from patients medical histories. Results.Totally 43 patients underwent FON with average age 49,5 years (29 - 79y.) Intrahospital mortality rate comparing with CON were 7% (3 patients) vs 9.2% (9 patients). 11 patients had complications (25,6%) vs 29 patients (30%) in CON group. 4 had intestinal fistula (9,3%), 6 - pancreatocutaneous fistula (14%), 1 – bleeding ( 2,3%). Mean hospitalisation time were 38,5 days vs 69 in CON group, mean time in intensive care unit – 16,6 days (0-107 d.) vs 21 in CON. Mean length of procedure were 71,3 minutes (25 – 135 min) vs 120 minutes in CON. 17 patients had repeated surgeries (39,5%) vs 64 (65,3%) in CON. Before surgery 22 patients had sepsis (51,1%). Amount of necrosis were excluded due to lack of data. Conclusions.FON can be used in treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis due to relatively low mortality rate, lower complication rates, shorter hospital stay, and nesessity of repeated surgeries also decreases.
Keywords. Focused open necrosectomy (FON), necrotic pancreatitis. Objectives. Necrotic pancreatitis is one of the most severe acute pancreatitis forms with relatively high mortality 15 – 32% (World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 2019). FON is minimally invasive surgical treatment method which firstly was done in Riga East Clinical University Hospital (RECUH) in 2008.Aim of this study was to evaluate FON – mortality, complications (pancreocutaneous fistula, intestinal fistula and bleeding), hospitalisation time (total time and time in intensive care unit), length of surgery, need for reoperation and patient severity before surgery (amount of necrosis, development of sepsis before surgery) and compare with conventional surgical necrosectomy (CON) which was primary treatment method of necrotizing pancreatitis in RECUH before FON. Materials and Methods.Retrospective study of patients who underwent FON from 2016 till 2019. Data were collected from patients medical histories. Results.Totally 43 patients underwent FON with average age 49,5 years (29 - 79y.) Intrahospital mortality rate comparing with CON were 7% (3 patients) vs 9.2% (9 patients). 11 patients had complications (25,6%) vs 29 patients (30%) in CON group. 4 had intestinal fistula (9,3%), 6 - pancreatocutaneous fistula (14%), 1 – bleeding ( 2,3%). Mean hospitalisation time were 38,5 days vs 69 in CON group, mean time in intensive care unit – 16,6 days (0-107 d.) vs 21 in CON. Mean length of procedure were 71,3 minutes (25 – 135 min) vs 120 minutes in CON. 17 patients had repeated surgeries (39,5%) vs 64 (65,3%) in CON. Before surgery 22 patients had sepsis (51,1%). Amount of necrosis were excluded due to lack of data. Conclusions.FON can be used in treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis due to relatively low mortality rate, lower complication rates, shorter hospital stay, and nesessity of repeated surgeries also decreases.
Description
Medicīna
Medicine
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care
Medicine
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care