Speciālās izmeklēšanas darbības – sakaru līdzekļu kontrole – tiesiskie un praktiskie aspekti
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīga Stradiņš University
Abstract
Bakalaura darba “Speciālās izmeklēšanas darbības – sakaru līdzekļu kontrole – tiesiskie un praktiskie aspekti”, tēma ir aktuāla, jo mūsdienās noziedznieki izmanto arvien radošākas metodes, lai viņu noziedzīgās darbības netiktu atklātas, noziedzīgie nodarījumi tiek rūpīgi gatavoti un realizēti slepenības apstākļos , tostarp, saziņai izmanto dažādas telekomunikāciju platformas, neveicot standarta balss zvanus un īsziņu sūtīšanu.
Bakalaura darba mērķis ir izpētīt speciālās izmeklēšanas darbības – sakaru līdzekļu kontrole – tiesisko regulējumu un tā piemērošanu praksē, kā arī konstatēt tiesiskā regulējuma nepilnības un rast priekšlikumus Kriminālprocesa likuma normu grozīšanai.
Bakalaura darbs sastāv no trim nodaļām un trim apakšnodaļām, kurās tiek apskatīti nosacījumi speciālo izmeklēšanas darbību, tostarp, sakaru līdzekļu kontroles, veikšanai, tiek apskatīts, kāda ir sakaru līdzekļu kontroles un pārraidīto datu satura kontroles atšķirība, vai tās nav saistītas speciālās izmeklēšanas darbības, kuras, ņemot vērā mūsdienu tehnoloģijas, būtu jāveic savstarpējā saistībā. Bakalaura darbā tiek apskatīts, kā Kriminālprocesa likumā noteiktā advokāte imunitāte ietekmē iespēju veikt advokāta lietoto sakaru līdzekļu kontroli, kā tā darbojas, kad kriminālprocesa ietvaros tiek veikta sakaru līdzekļu kontrole kādas personas sakaru līdzekļiem, un tiek konstatētas, fiksētas sarunas ar advokātu, kādi ir likumā paredzētie rīcības modeļi šādā situācijā.
Bakalaura darba izstrādes laikā autore sasniedza izvirzīto mērķi un konstatēja, ka pastāv gan tiesiska, gan praktiska rakstura problēmas, kas liedz veikt skaru līdzekļu kontroli, lai iegūtu ziņas par kriminālprocesā pierādāmajiem apstākļiem. Piemēram, darba autore konstatēja, ka Kriminālprocesa likuma 218. pantā nav noteikts vai veicot sakaru līdzekļu kontroli ar kontrolējamās personas rakstveida piekrišanu, ir nepieciešams pieņemt lēmumu par sakaru līdzekļu kontroli, kā arī, konstatēja, ka Kriminālprocesa likumā nav noteikts, kāda informācija ir norādāma speciālās izmeklēšanas darbības pārskatā. Pamatojoties uz darba autores secinājumiem, darba autore piedāvā veikt grozījumus Kriminālprocesa likuma 216., 218., 220., 229. un 230. pantā, kas darba autores ieskatā sekmētu kriminālprocesa mērķa sasniegšanu. Piemēram, darba autore piedāvā papildināt Kriminālprocesa likuma 216. pantu ar 3.1 daļu šādā redakcijā: “Speciālās izmeklēšanas darbības pārskatā norādāms faktiskais speciālās izmeklēšanas darbības veikšanas ilgums”.
Bakalaura darbs izstrādāts uz 61 lappuses.
The subject of the Bachelor's work “Special investigative activitie — control of means of communication — legal and practical aspects” is topical, as nowadays criminals use increasingly creative methods to prevent their criminal activities from being detected, criminal offences are carefully prepared and implemented under conditions of secrecy , including the use of different telecommunication platforms for communication without making standard voice calls and sending SMS messages. The purpose of the bachelor's work is to study the legal framework of the special investigative activitie – control of means of communication – and its application in practice, as well as to determine the deficiencies of the legal framework and to find proposals for amending the norms of the Criminal Procedure Law. The Bachelor's thesis consists of three chapters and three sub-chapters dealing with the conditions for carrying out special investigative activities, including the control of means of communication, examining the difference between the control of means of communication and the control of the content of the data transmitted, or the related special investigative activities, which, in the light of modern technology, should be carried out in conjunction with each other. The Bachelor's thesis discusses how the immunity of a lawyer laid down in the Criminal Procedure Law affects the possibility to perform control of the means of communication used by a lawyer, how it operates when control of means of communication is performed in the framework of criminal proceedings over the means of communication of a person, and finds, records negotiations with a lawyer, what are the models of action provided for by law in such a situation. At the time of the drafting of the Bachelor's thesis, the author achieved the objective pursued and found that there were problems of both a legal and practical nature which prevented the control of the relevant means of obtaining information on the circumstances to be proved in criminal proceedings. For example, the author of the work determined that Section 218 of the Criminal Procedure Law does not specify or when performing control of means of communication with the written consent of the controlled person, it is necessary to take a decision regarding control of means of communication, as well as determined that the Criminal Procedure Law does not specify what information is to be indicated in the report of the special investigative activity. On he basis of the conclusions of the author of the work, the author of the work proposes amendments to Sections 216, 218, 220, 229 and 230 of the Criminal Procedure Law, which, according to the author of the work, would contribute to the achievement of the objective of criminal proceedings. For example, the author of the work proposes to supplement Section 216 of the Criminal Procedure Law with Paragraph 3.1 in the following wording: “the actual duration of the performance of the special investiga
The subject of the Bachelor's work “Special investigative activitie — control of means of communication — legal and practical aspects” is topical, as nowadays criminals use increasingly creative methods to prevent their criminal activities from being detected, criminal offences are carefully prepared and implemented under conditions of secrecy , including the use of different telecommunication platforms for communication without making standard voice calls and sending SMS messages. The purpose of the bachelor's work is to study the legal framework of the special investigative activitie – control of means of communication – and its application in practice, as well as to determine the deficiencies of the legal framework and to find proposals for amending the norms of the Criminal Procedure Law. The Bachelor's thesis consists of three chapters and three sub-chapters dealing with the conditions for carrying out special investigative activities, including the control of means of communication, examining the difference between the control of means of communication and the control of the content of the data transmitted, or the related special investigative activities, which, in the light of modern technology, should be carried out in conjunction with each other. The Bachelor's thesis discusses how the immunity of a lawyer laid down in the Criminal Procedure Law affects the possibility to perform control of the means of communication used by a lawyer, how it operates when control of means of communication is performed in the framework of criminal proceedings over the means of communication of a person, and finds, records negotiations with a lawyer, what are the models of action provided for by law in such a situation. At the time of the drafting of the Bachelor's thesis, the author achieved the objective pursued and found that there were problems of both a legal and practical nature which prevented the control of the relevant means of obtaining information on the circumstances to be proved in criminal proceedings. For example, the author of the work determined that Section 218 of the Criminal Procedure Law does not specify or when performing control of means of communication with the written consent of the controlled person, it is necessary to take a decision regarding control of means of communication, as well as determined that the Criminal Procedure Law does not specify what information is to be indicated in the report of the special investigative activity. On he basis of the conclusions of the author of the work, the author of the work proposes amendments to Sections 216, 218, 220, 229 and 230 of the Criminal Procedure Law, which, according to the author of the work, would contribute to the achievement of the objective of criminal proceedings. For example, the author of the work proposes to supplement Section 216 of the Criminal Procedure Law with Paragraph 3.1 in the following wording: “the actual duration of the performance of the special investiga
Description
Tiesību zinātne
Law Science
Tiesību zinātne
Law Science
Law Science
Tiesību zinātne
Law Science
Keywords
Sakaru līdzekļu kontrole; advokāta imunitāte; pārraidīto datu satura kontrole, control of means of communication; control of the content of the data transmitted; immunity of a lawyer