Vakuumekstrakcijas ietekme uz dzemdību iznākumu
Notiek ielāde...
Datums
Autori
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīga Stradiņš University
Kopsavilkums
Apraksts: Vakuuma ekstrakcija ir viena no visplašāk pielietotajām instrumentālajām dzemdību metodēm. To visbiežāk izmantot brīžos, kad nepieciešams saīsināt otro dzemdību fāzi. Tomēr, šī metode saistās arī ar virkni dažādu komplikāciju jaundzimušajiem, tādām kā kefalohematomas, galvas ādas nobrāzumi, augļa galviņas konfigurācija un tūska, retinālās hemorāģijas, kā arī ar nopietnākām komplikācijām, kā piemēram, subgaleāla un intrakraniāla hemorāģija. Komplikāciju riski ir augsti ne tikai jaundzimušajiem, bet arī dzemdētājām, kurām ir paaugstināts risks dažādu pakāpju vaginālām ruptūrām un epiziotomiju biežumam. Ņemot vērā augsto komplikāciju risku, ir ieteicams individuāli izvērtēt indikācijas vakuumekstrakcijai.
Mērķis: Pētījuma mērķis ir izanalizēt vakuuma ekstrakcijas ietekmi uz dzemdību iznākumiem.
Metodes: Pētījuma ietvaros tika izmantoti 931 medicīnisko vēsturu dati par grūtniecēm un jaundzimušajiem, kas uzturējušies Rīgas dzemdību namā laika posmā no 2016. gada janvāra līdz 2016. gada decembrim. Visas pētījumā iekļautās sievietes tika sadalītas divās grupās atbilstoši dzemdību metodei, t.i., normālās un vakuuma asistētās dzemdībās. Datu apstrāde tika veikta ar statistikas programmu SPSS.
Rezultāti: Datu analīzē novērota izteikta atšķirība starp vakuuma asistētām un normālām dzemdībām starp tādiem parametriem, kā Apgares skalas vērtējums 1. minūtē (P < 0,001) un 5. minūtē (P < 0,001), akūtu un progresējošu augļa distresu (P < 0,001), atslēgas kaulu lūzumiem dzemdību laikā (P = 0,002) un kefalohematomu veidošanos (P < 0,001).
Tika atklāta saistība starp vienu no mātes komplikācijām, kas ir ruptura vaginae profunda (P < 0,001) un epiziotomijas nepieciešamību (P < 0,001). Tāpat pēc pētījuma datiem bija iespējams secināt, ka ruptura labii minores, majores un ruptura perinei ir mazāk sastopama vakuuma asistētās nekā normālās dzemdībās. (P < 0,001).
Secinājumi: Pastāv statistiski nozīmīga korelācija starp vakuuma asistētām dzemdībām un mātes un jaundzimušo komplikācijām. Vakuum ekstrakcija ir viens no operatīvo vaginālo dzemdību veidiem un to nepieciešams pielietot tikai konkrētu indikāciju gadījumā.
Background: A vacuum extraction is one of the main types of assisted delivery methods used in a modern medicine. It is an instrument of choice when the shortening of second stage labour is required. However, this method is associated with various complications for the new-born, such as cefalohematoma, scalp bruising, caput succedaneum, retinal hemorrhage, and more severe complications like subgaleal hemorrhage and intracranial hemorrhage. Besides that, the mother may be affected by an increased risk of vaginal rupture and likeliness of episiotomy, therefore it is a must to review the indications for each individual case. Aim: The purpose of this study is to analyse how vacuum-assisted delivery affects delivery outcomes. Methods: A total number of 931 medical history records of pregnant women and neonates were included in this study. A comprehensive collection of research data was carried out between January 2016 and December 2016 in the Maternity Hospital of Riga. All women listed in this study were split into two groups based on the delivery methods, i.e. normal and vacuum-assisted delivery. The analysis of this research was done by using the SPSS statistical program. Results: There were significant delivery outcome differences for vacuum–assisted delivery in comparison to normal deliveries in Apgar score in the first minute (P < 0,001) and after 5 minutes (P < 0,001), acute and progressive fetal distress (P < 0,001), neonatal clavicle fracture during delivery (P = 0,002) and cephalohematoma (P < 0,001). A correlation was found between maternal complications – profound vaginal rupture (P < 0,001) and need for episiotomy (P < 0,001). In addition, this study revealed that labia minora, majora and perineum rupture was less common in vacuum extraction than in normal delivery (P < 0,001). Conclusion(s): There is a statistically significant correlation between vacuum-assisted delivery and maternal and neonatal complications during childbirth. The vacuum extraction is an operative vaginal delivery and it is necessary to be used only in the case when the indications are present.
Background: A vacuum extraction is one of the main types of assisted delivery methods used in a modern medicine. It is an instrument of choice when the shortening of second stage labour is required. However, this method is associated with various complications for the new-born, such as cefalohematoma, scalp bruising, caput succedaneum, retinal hemorrhage, and more severe complications like subgaleal hemorrhage and intracranial hemorrhage. Besides that, the mother may be affected by an increased risk of vaginal rupture and likeliness of episiotomy, therefore it is a must to review the indications for each individual case. Aim: The purpose of this study is to analyse how vacuum-assisted delivery affects delivery outcomes. Methods: A total number of 931 medical history records of pregnant women and neonates were included in this study. A comprehensive collection of research data was carried out between January 2016 and December 2016 in the Maternity Hospital of Riga. All women listed in this study were split into two groups based on the delivery methods, i.e. normal and vacuum-assisted delivery. The analysis of this research was done by using the SPSS statistical program. Results: There were significant delivery outcome differences for vacuum–assisted delivery in comparison to normal deliveries in Apgar score in the first minute (P < 0,001) and after 5 minutes (P < 0,001), acute and progressive fetal distress (P < 0,001), neonatal clavicle fracture during delivery (P = 0,002) and cephalohematoma (P < 0,001). A correlation was found between maternal complications – profound vaginal rupture (P < 0,001) and need for episiotomy (P < 0,001). In addition, this study revealed that labia minora, majora and perineum rupture was less common in vacuum extraction than in normal delivery (P < 0,001). Conclusion(s): There is a statistically significant correlation between vacuum-assisted delivery and maternal and neonatal complications during childbirth. The vacuum extraction is an operative vaginal delivery and it is necessary to be used only in the case when the indications are present.
Description
Medicīna
Medicine
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care
Medicine
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care