Krāpšanas kvalifikācija un tiesiskie aspekti
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīga Stradiņš University
Abstract
Bakalaura darba tēma ir “Krāpšanas kvalifikācija un tiesiskie aspekti”. Bakalaura darba pirmajā daļā tiek izpētīta krāpšana, kas kvalificējas pēc 1933.gada Sodu likuma, 1940.gada Sodu likuma, 1961.gada Kriminālkodeksa un Krimināllikuma esoša redakcija. Bakalaura darba otrajā un trešajā daļā tiek izpētītas noziedzīga nodarījuma, kas kvalificējas pēc Krimināllikuma 177.panta krāpšana objektīvas un subjektīvas pazīmes. Bakalaura darba ceturtajā daļā tiek izpētītas Krimināllikuma 177.panta krāpšanas nošķišana no Krimināllikuma 175.panta zādzības, 179.panta piesavināšanās un Krimināllikuma 218.panta izvairīšanas no nodokļu samaksas. Galvenā atšķirība ir noziedzīga nodarījuma sastāva, proti, krāpšanas gadījumā persona labprātīgi nodod mantu krāpniekam un krāpniekam rodas nodoms iegūt mantu pirms tās saņemšanas. Darba mērķis ir izpētīt krāpšanu kā noziedzīga nodarījuma veida tiesisko regulējumu un tā piemērošanu. Krāpšanu ir iespējams izdarīt ļaunprātīgi izmantojot personas uzticēšanos vai ar viltu un, lai kvalificētu krāpšanu pēc Krimināllikuma 177.panta izkrāptas mantas vērtībai jābūt lielākai par vienu noteiktu minimālo mēnešalgu, pretēja gadījumā tāds noziedzīgs nodarījums kvalificējas pēc Krimināllikuma 180.panta. Krimināllikuma 177.pants ierobežo noziedzīga nodarījuma priekšmetu, kas var būt tikai manta vai tiesības uz mantu, proti, citās valstīs nekonkretizē krāpšanas priekšmetu, ar to dod priekšrocību, ja krāpšanas priekšmets ir nedz manta, nedz tiesības uz mantu. Darba kopējais apjoms ir 58 lapaspuses.
The topic of the bachelor's thesis is "Qualification and legal aspects of fraud". The first part of the bachelor's thesis investigates fraud, which qualifies according to the Penal Law of 1933, the Penal Law of 1940, the Criminal Code of 1961 and the existing version of the Criminal Law. The second and third parts of the bachelor's thesis investigate the objective and subjective features of a criminal offense that qualifies under Article 177 of the Criminal Law fraud. In the fourth part of the bachelor's thesis, the separation of Section 177 of the Criminal Law from the theft of Section 175 of the Criminal Law, misappropriation of Section 179 and tax evasion of Section 218 of the Criminal Law is investigated. The main difference is the composition of the criminal offense, ie in the case of fraud, a person voluntarily transfers property to the fraudster and the fraudster intends to acquire the property before receiving it. The aim of the work is to study fraud as a legal regulation of a type of criminal offense and its application. Fraud can be committed by abusing a person's trust or by deception, and in order to qualify fraud under Section 177 of the Criminal Law, the value of the fraudulent property must be higher than one certain minimum monthly salary, otherwise such a criminal offense qualifies under Section 180 of the Criminal Law. Article 177 of the Criminal Law restricts the object of a criminal offense, which may be only property or the right to property, in other countries it does not specify the object of fraud, thus giving an advantage if the object of fraud was neither property nor the right to property. The total volume of the work is 58 pages.
The topic of the bachelor's thesis is "Qualification and legal aspects of fraud". The first part of the bachelor's thesis investigates fraud, which qualifies according to the Penal Law of 1933, the Penal Law of 1940, the Criminal Code of 1961 and the existing version of the Criminal Law. The second and third parts of the bachelor's thesis investigate the objective and subjective features of a criminal offense that qualifies under Article 177 of the Criminal Law fraud. In the fourth part of the bachelor's thesis, the separation of Section 177 of the Criminal Law from the theft of Section 175 of the Criminal Law, misappropriation of Section 179 and tax evasion of Section 218 of the Criminal Law is investigated. The main difference is the composition of the criminal offense, ie in the case of fraud, a person voluntarily transfers property to the fraudster and the fraudster intends to acquire the property before receiving it. The aim of the work is to study fraud as a legal regulation of a type of criminal offense and its application. Fraud can be committed by abusing a person's trust or by deception, and in order to qualify fraud under Section 177 of the Criminal Law, the value of the fraudulent property must be higher than one certain minimum monthly salary, otherwise such a criminal offense qualifies under Section 180 of the Criminal Law. Article 177 of the Criminal Law restricts the object of a criminal offense, which may be only property or the right to property, in other countries it does not specify the object of fraud, thus giving an advantage if the object of fraud was neither property nor the right to property. The total volume of the work is 58 pages.
Description
Tiesību zinātne
Law Science
Tiesību zinātne
Law Science
Law Science
Tiesību zinātne
Law Science
Keywords
Krimināllikums, Krimināllikums 177.pants, krāpšana, kvalifikācija, noziedzīgs nodarījums, sastāvs, viltus, uzticēšana, Criminal Law Law Section 177, fraud, qualification, criminal offense, composition, false, entrustment