Autologu trombocītu koncentrātu pielietošanas iespējas smaganu recesiju ārstēšanā
Notiek ielāde...
Datums
Autori
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīga Stradiņš University
Kopsavilkums
Mērķis: Apkopot literatūru par autologu trombocītu koncentrātu (ATK) veidiem, darbības mehānismu un pielietojumu periodonta reģenerācijā, kā arī novērtēt ATK lietošanas efektivitāti, uzlabojot klīniskā piestiprinājuma līmeni (CAL), zondēšanas dziļumu (PD), saknes pārsegšanu (RC), keratinizētās gļotādas platumu (KMW), smaganu biezumu (GT) un pacientu pašnovērtējumu smaganu recesiju (SR) ārstēšanā (PROMs).
Metodes: Pētījuma dizains ir plašatvēruma pārskats. Tika atlasīti sistemātiskie pārskati un meta-analīzes, kas pievēršas ATK pielietošanai SR ārstēšanā. Iekļaušanas kritēriji ietvēra publikāciju gadus (2019–2024), pētījumu dizainu (sistemātiskais pārskats vai meta-analīze), recenzētās publikācijas, pētījumus angļu valodā, pilna teksta pētījumus, kas veikti uz cilvēkiem. Meklēšana tika veikta datubāzēs PubMed, Wiley un EBSCO. Kopumā tika identificēti 299 raksti, no kuriem 8 tika iekļauti gala pārskatā. Neobjektivitātes risks tika novērtēts, izmantojot AMSTAR-2 metodi.
Rezultāti: Seši no apskatītajiem pētījumiem salīdzināja koronāli pārvietotu lēveri (CAF)
kombinācijā ar trombocītiem bagātinātu fibrīnu (PRF) un CAF kombinācijā ar saistaudu transplantātiem (CTG). Statistiski nozīmīgas atšķirības starp grupām attiecībā uz CAL, PD vai RC rādītājiem netika novērotas. Tomēr CTG grupas uzrādīja labākus rezultātus KMW un GT uzlabošanā. PRF lietošana CTG donora vietā samazināja pēcoperācijas sāpes un diskomfortu. Pieci pētījumi analizēja CAF kombinācijā ar PRF un CAF monoterapijā. Tika novērots statistiski nozīmīgs CAL uzlabojums PRF grupās visos pētījumos. Tomēr PRF pievienošana CAF procedūrām neuzlaboja PD un KMW rādītājus.
Secinājumi:
1. CTG joprojām ir SR ārstēšanas „zelta standarts”, jo salīdzinot ar ATK, efektīvāk uzlabo KMW, GT, kā arī nodrošina labākus RC rādītājus. PRF aplikācija CTG donoru vietās samazina pēcoperācijas sāpes un komplikāciju risku.
2. PRF membrānas kombinācijā ar CAF, uzlabo CAL, potenciāli palielina GT un veicina periodonta reģenerāciju.
3. Nepieciešami papildu randomizēti klīniskie pētījumi ar standartizētiem PRF sagatavošanas protokoliem. Papildu pētījumi būtu jāveic, lai izpētītu, kā PRF pagatavošanas metode un materiāli ietekmē tā īpašības.
Objectives: The study aimed to compile literature on the types, mechanisms of action, and applications of autologous platelet concentrates (APC) in periodontal regeneration and evaluate the effectiveness of autologous platelet concentrates in improving clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), root coverage (RC), keratinized mucosa width (KMW), gingival thickness (GT), and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) in the treatment of gingival recessions (GR). Materials and Methods: This study was designed as a literature review. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses focusing on APC application in GR treatment were selected. Inclusion and exclusion criteria included publication years (2019–2024), study design (systematic review or meta-analysis), peer-reviewed publications, English-language studies, full-text availability, and research conducted on humans. Databases searched were PubMed, Wiley, and EBSCO. A total of 299 articles were identified, with 8 studies included in the final review. Risk of bias was assessed using AMSTAR-2. Results: Six studies compared coronally advanced flap (CAF) combined with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) to CAF combined with connective tissue grafts (CTG). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for CAL, PD, or RC outcomes. However, CTG groups demonstrated superior results for KMW and GT. PRF application at the CTG donor site reduced postoperative pain and complications. CAF combined with PRF and CAF monotherapy were analyzed in five studies, showing statistically significant CAL improvement in PRF groups across all studies. However, PRF addition to CAF procedures did not improve PD or KMW outcomes. Conclusions: 1. CTG remains the gold standard for GR treatment, providing superior outcomes in KMW, GT, and RC. PRF application at CTG donor sites reduces postoperative pain and complication risks. 2. PRF membranes used with CAF improve CAL, potentially increase GT, and support periodontal regeneration. 3. Further randomized clinical trials with standardized PRF preparation protocols are required. Additional research should explore how PRF preparation methods and materials affect its properties.
Objectives: The study aimed to compile literature on the types, mechanisms of action, and applications of autologous platelet concentrates (APC) in periodontal regeneration and evaluate the effectiveness of autologous platelet concentrates in improving clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), root coverage (RC), keratinized mucosa width (KMW), gingival thickness (GT), and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) in the treatment of gingival recessions (GR). Materials and Methods: This study was designed as a literature review. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses focusing on APC application in GR treatment were selected. Inclusion and exclusion criteria included publication years (2019–2024), study design (systematic review or meta-analysis), peer-reviewed publications, English-language studies, full-text availability, and research conducted on humans. Databases searched were PubMed, Wiley, and EBSCO. A total of 299 articles were identified, with 8 studies included in the final review. Risk of bias was assessed using AMSTAR-2. Results: Six studies compared coronally advanced flap (CAF) combined with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) to CAF combined with connective tissue grafts (CTG). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for CAL, PD, or RC outcomes. However, CTG groups demonstrated superior results for KMW and GT. PRF application at the CTG donor site reduced postoperative pain and complications. CAF combined with PRF and CAF monotherapy were analyzed in five studies, showing statistically significant CAL improvement in PRF groups across all studies. However, PRF addition to CAF procedures did not improve PD or KMW outcomes. Conclusions: 1. CTG remains the gold standard for GR treatment, providing superior outcomes in KMW, GT, and RC. PRF application at CTG donor sites reduces postoperative pain and complication risks. 2. PRF membranes used with CAF improve CAL, potentially increase GT, and support periodontal regeneration. 3. Further randomized clinical trials with standardized PRF preparation protocols are required. Additional research should explore how PRF preparation methods and materials affect its properties.
Description
Zobārstniecība
Dentistry
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care
Dentistry
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care