Laulāto kopīgās mantas dalīšanas tiesiskie un praktiskie aspekti.
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2022
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīga Stradiņš University
Abstract
ANOTĀCIJA
Maģistra darba tēma ir “Laulāto kopīgās mantas dalīšanas tiesiskie un praktiskie aspekti”.
Autore savā darbā pēta laulāto kopīgās mantas dalīšanu no teorētiskās un praktiskās puses, sniedzot ieskatu kādā veidā veidojas laulāto kopīga manta.
Ar laulāto kopīgās mantas sadali saistītā problemātika, kuru autore savā darbā norāda, ir radusies ņemot vērā atšķirīgo tiesu praksi un nepilnīgu tiesisko regulējumu.
Viens no problēmjautājumiem praksē ir tāds, ka var konstatēt kopdzīves pārtraukšanu arī pēc likumīgā spēkā stājušās tiesas sprieduma (prejudiciāls fakts - Civilprocesa likuma 96.panta otro daļu fakti, kas nodibināti ar likumīgā spēkā stājušos spriedumu vienā civillietā, nav no jauna jāpierāda, iztiesājot citas civillietas, kurās piedalās tās pašas puses) par laulības šķiršanu starp pusēm, bet gadījumos kad laulība vēl nav šķirta un tiek celta prasība par laulāto kopīgas mantas sadali, šo kopīgās saimniecības vešanas pārtraukšanu konstatēt ir sarežģīti, gadījumos kad katrs no laulātajiem norāda atšķirīgu kopīgās saimniecības vešanas pārtraukšanas brīdi. Otrkārt, vēl viena būtiska problēma saistīta arī ar to, ka laulāto kopīgās mantas dalīšanas rezultātā netiek ievērotas nepilngadīgo jeb laulāto kopīgo bērnu intereses, jo vecāku pienākums tai skaitā ir nodrošināt bērnam dzīves vietu, bet laulāto kopīgās mantas – kopīga īpašuma dalīšanas gadījumā (nekustamais īpašums vai kustāma manta), nepilngadīgo bērnu intereses netiek ievērotas. Kā trešo praktisko problēmjautājumu autore vēlas izcelt arī trešo pušu interešu aizsardzību laulāto kopīgās mantas sadales procesā. Tas izpaužas tādā veidā, ka trešās personas (piemēram, kreditori) ne vienmēr ir informētas par mantas sadales procesu un vēlāk, vēršot prasību pret parādnieku, parāda piedziņas process var ievilkties vai kļūt par neiespējamu, jo sarežģīti noskaidrojams, pret kuru pusi jāvērš prasījums.
Pētījuma mērķis: izpētot laulāto kopīgās mantas sadales normatīvo regulējumu un tā piemērošanas un izpildes praktiskos aspektus, izstrādāt priekšlikumus apzināto problēmjautājumu risinājumiem. Lai minēto mērķi sasniegtu, autore izvirza 3 (trīs) uzdevumus: izanalizēt laulāto kopīgas mantas jēdzienu, juridisko raksturu un dalīšanas veidus; noskaidrot laulāto kopīgās mantas sastāva noteikšanas būtiskākos aspektus, izpētot arī trešo personu tiesību aizsardzību laulāto kopīgās mantas sadales procesā; analizēt laulāto mantas dalīšanas regulējumu ārvalstīs.
Darbs sastāv no ievada, trim nodaļām, secinājumiem un priekšlikumiem.
Kopējais darba apjoms ir 77 lappuses. Darbs ir uzrakstīts, pamatojoties uz tiesību normām, tiesu praksi, tiesību doktrīnu, nozares literatūru un pētījumiem.
Atslēgas vārdi: laulāto kopīgās mantas dalīšana.
ABSTRACT The topic of master's work is “Legal and practical aspects of the division of joint property of spouses.” The author studies the division of common property of spouses from a theoretical and practical point of view, providing an insight into how the common property of spouses is formed. The problem related to the division of the joint property of the spouses, which the author points out in his work, has arisen due to the different court practice and incomplete legal regulation. One of the problems in practice is that it is possible to establish the termination of cohabitation even after a lawful court judgment (preliminary fact - facts of Section 96, Paragraph two of the Civil Procedure Law established by a lawful lawsuit in one civil case (involving the same parties) on divorce between the parties, but in cases where the marriage has not yet been divorced and a claim is made for the division of the joint property of the spouses, it is difficult to establish that the divorce is different moment. Secondly, another significant problem is related to the fact that the interests of minors or joint children of spouses are not taken into account as a result of the division of common property of spouses, as parents have a duty to provide a place for the child. movable property), the interests of minors are not taken into account. The author also wants to highlight the protection of the interests of third parties in the process of distribution of joint property of spouses as a third practical problem. This is due to the fact that third parties (such as creditors) are not always aware of the distribution process and the debt recovery process may be delayed or impossible at a later stage, as it is difficult to determine which party to turn to. The aim of the research: by studying the normative regulation of the distribution of the joint property of the spouses and the practical aspects of its application and enforcement, to develop proposals for the solution of the identified problems. In order to achieve the mentioned goal, the author sets 3 (three) tasks: to analyze the concept of the joint property of the spouses, the legal nature and the ways of division; to find out the most important aspects of determining the composition of the joint property of the spouses, also studying the protection of the rights of third parties in the process of distribution of the joint property of the spouses; to analyze the regulation of the division of property of spouses abroad. The Work consists of an introduction, 3 (three ) chapters, conclusions and proposals. The total volume of the work is 77 pages. The work is written on the basis of legal norms, case law, legal doctrine, industry literature and research. Keywords: division of joint property of spouses.
ABSTRACT The topic of master's work is “Legal and practical aspects of the division of joint property of spouses.” The author studies the division of common property of spouses from a theoretical and practical point of view, providing an insight into how the common property of spouses is formed. The problem related to the division of the joint property of the spouses, which the author points out in his work, has arisen due to the different court practice and incomplete legal regulation. One of the problems in practice is that it is possible to establish the termination of cohabitation even after a lawful court judgment (preliminary fact - facts of Section 96, Paragraph two of the Civil Procedure Law established by a lawful lawsuit in one civil case (involving the same parties) on divorce between the parties, but in cases where the marriage has not yet been divorced and a claim is made for the division of the joint property of the spouses, it is difficult to establish that the divorce is different moment. Secondly, another significant problem is related to the fact that the interests of minors or joint children of spouses are not taken into account as a result of the division of common property of spouses, as parents have a duty to provide a place for the child. movable property), the interests of minors are not taken into account. The author also wants to highlight the protection of the interests of third parties in the process of distribution of joint property of spouses as a third practical problem. This is due to the fact that third parties (such as creditors) are not always aware of the distribution process and the debt recovery process may be delayed or impossible at a later stage, as it is difficult to determine which party to turn to. The aim of the research: by studying the normative regulation of the distribution of the joint property of the spouses and the practical aspects of its application and enforcement, to develop proposals for the solution of the identified problems. In order to achieve the mentioned goal, the author sets 3 (three) tasks: to analyze the concept of the joint property of the spouses, the legal nature and the ways of division; to find out the most important aspects of determining the composition of the joint property of the spouses, also studying the protection of the rights of third parties in the process of distribution of the joint property of the spouses; to analyze the regulation of the division of property of spouses abroad. The Work consists of an introduction, 3 (three ) chapters, conclusions and proposals. The total volume of the work is 77 pages. The work is written on the basis of legal norms, case law, legal doctrine, industry literature and research. Keywords: division of joint property of spouses.
Description
Tiesību zinātne
Law Science
Tiesību zinātne
Law Science
Law Science
Tiesību zinātne
Law Science
Keywords
laulāto kopīgās mantas dalīšana, division of joint property of spouses.