Aspirīna kā antitrombotiska līdzekļa lietošanas pamatotība aptiekas klientu vidū Vecmīlgrāvī.
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīga Stradiņš University
Abstract
Pētījuma pamatojums. Aspirīna lietošanas pamatotības novērtēšana ir svarīga, lai saprastu situāciju aptieku apmeklētāju vidū un popularizētu problēmu, kas ir – nepamatota aspirīna lietošana. Pētījuma mērķis ir izvērtēt aspirīna lietošanas pamatotību aptiekas klientu vidū, balstoties uz aptaujā iegūtiem datiem un analizējot izpētīto literatūru.
Materiāli un metodes. Pētījumā tika veikta anonīma aptauja aptiekas klientu vidū, kas iegādājas aspirīnu kā antitrombotisku līdzekli. Aptauja noritēja no 2019.gada augustam līdz 2020.gada februārim. Aptauja sastāvēja no jautājumiem par aspirīna lietošanas devu, ilgumu, hroniskajām saslimšanām, citiem lietotajiem medikamentiem un sūdzību par asiņošanu un kuņģa-zarnu trakta problēmu klātesamību. Rezultāti tika apkopoti un analizēti ar Microsoft Excel programmu.
Rezultāti. Pētījumā piedalījās 70 cilvēki, no kuriem pārstāvētākās vecuma grupas bija 66-75 gadi un 75 gadi un vairāk. Visiem aptaujātajiem bija vismaz viena kardioloģiskā saslimšana – arteriālā hipertensija. Visi aspirīnu lieto kā sekundārās profilakses līdzekli. Biežāk sastopamās hroniskās slimības aptaujāto vidū: Arteriālā hipertensija (70 cilvēki), koronāra sirds slimība (30 cilvēki), hroniska sirds slimība (28 cilvēki). 67 cilvēkiem (96%) aspirīnu ieteica lietot speciālists – kardiologs vai ģimenes ārsts. Sūdzības par asiņošanu bija 8 cilvēkiem, kuņģa-zarnu trakta problēmām 11 cilvēkiem.
Secinājumi. Aptiekas klienti aspirīnu kā antritrombotrisku līdzekli lieto pamatoti, jo, izvērtējot iegūtos datus un analizēto literatūru, tikai 3 no 70 aptaujātajiem aspirīna lietošana nav pamatojama.
Objectives. Assessing the appropriateness of using aspirin is important to understand the situation among pharmacy visitors and to popularize the problem of unreasonable use of aspirin. The aim of the study is to evaluate the validity of aspirin use among pharmacy clients, based on the data obtained from the survey and the analysis of the researched literature. Materials and methods. The study conducted an anonymous survey of pharmacy clients purchasing aspirin as an antithrombotic agent. The survey took place from August 2019 to February 2020. The survey consisted of questions about dose the dose, duration of treatment, chronic illness, other medications used and complains regarding bleeding and gastrointestinal problems. The results were compiled and analyzed with Microsoft Excel. Results. The study included 70 people, with the most represented age groups being 66-75 years and 75 years and over. All people surveyed had at least one cardiologic disease – arterial hypertension. In all cases aspirin is used as a secondary prevention measure. The most common chronic diseases among those surveyed were arterial hypertension (70 people), coronary heart disease (30 people), chronic heart disease (28 people). 67 people (96%) were recommended to take aspirin by a specialist – cardiologist or family doctor. 8 people had bleeding complaints and 11 had gastrointestinal problems. Conclusion. Pharmacy customers use aspirin rightly as an antithrombotic agent because, based on the evaluation of the data obtained and the literature analyzed, only in 3 out of 70 cases of respondents the use of aspirin wasn’t justified.
Objectives. Assessing the appropriateness of using aspirin is important to understand the situation among pharmacy visitors and to popularize the problem of unreasonable use of aspirin. The aim of the study is to evaluate the validity of aspirin use among pharmacy clients, based on the data obtained from the survey and the analysis of the researched literature. Materials and methods. The study conducted an anonymous survey of pharmacy clients purchasing aspirin as an antithrombotic agent. The survey took place from August 2019 to February 2020. The survey consisted of questions about dose the dose, duration of treatment, chronic illness, other medications used and complains regarding bleeding and gastrointestinal problems. The results were compiled and analyzed with Microsoft Excel. Results. The study included 70 people, with the most represented age groups being 66-75 years and 75 years and over. All people surveyed had at least one cardiologic disease – arterial hypertension. In all cases aspirin is used as a secondary prevention measure. The most common chronic diseases among those surveyed were arterial hypertension (70 people), coronary heart disease (30 people), chronic heart disease (28 people). 67 people (96%) were recommended to take aspirin by a specialist – cardiologist or family doctor. 8 people had bleeding complaints and 11 had gastrointestinal problems. Conclusion. Pharmacy customers use aspirin rightly as an antithrombotic agent because, based on the evaluation of the data obtained and the literature analyzed, only in 3 out of 70 cases of respondents the use of aspirin wasn’t justified.
Description
Farmācija
Pharmacy
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care
Pharmacy
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care
Keywords
Aspirīns, aspirīna lietošanas ieguvumi, riski, pamatotība, Aspirin, aspirin benefits, risks, validity of the use.