Novērtēšanas instrumenta “Individuāli prioritizētu grūtību analīze (IPGA)” latviešu valodas versijas ticamības parbaude ergoterapeitu praksē
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīga Stradiņš University
Abstract
Aktualitāte: Klīniskajā praksē ir pieejami vairāki standartizēti novērtēšanas instrumenti, tomēr ir maz novērtēšanas instrumentu, kas īpaši paredzēti, lai novērtētu tehnisko palīglīdzekļu lietošanas rezultātu jeb efektivitāti. Novērtēšanas instruments “Individuāli prioritizētu grūtību analīze (IPGA)” ir vispārējs efektivitātes mērījums, ko var izmantot, lai novērtētu tehnisko palīglīdzekļu pakalpojumu efektivitāti cilvēkiem ar funkcionēšanas traucējumiem.
Pētījuma mērķis: Pārbaudīt novērtēšanas instrumenta “Individuāli prioritizētu grūtību analīze (IPGA)” latviešu valodas versijas ticamību ergoterapeitu praksē.
Pētījuma metodes: Kvantitatīvs, neeksperimentāls aprakstošs pētījums. Pētījuma procesa laikā tika sagatavota novērtēšanas instrumenta “Individuāli prioritizētu grūtību analīze” latviešu valodas versija un veikta ticamības līmeņa pārbaude ergoterapeitu praksē. . Instrumenta ticamības pārbaudei tika izmantots Cohen’s d efektivitātes rādītājs.
Pētījuma dalībnieki: Pētījumā piedalījās 36 dalībnieki, no kuriem 75 % bija rehabilitācijas centra un 25 % tehnisko palīglīdzekļu centra pakalpojumu saņēmēji. Dalībnieku vidējais vecums bija 65,31 gadi (SD = 16,34).
Novērtēšanas instrumenti: Sociāldemogrāfisko datu anketa, novērtēšanas instruments “Individuāli prioritizētu grūtību analīze” (Ozoliņa, V., Liepiņa, Z., 2021). Tika veikta instrumenta tulkošana uz latviešu valodu, kurā iesaistījās pētnieks un tulks, sagatavota lietošanas instrukcija.
Pētījuma rezultāti: Cohen’s d efektivitātes lielums tika noteikts divām aktivitāšu grupām – mobilitātes (Cohen’s d = 2,09) un pašaprūpes (Cohen’s d = 3,69) aktivitātēm. Pārējām aktivitāšu grupām tas netika noteikts, jo to dati nebija statistiski nozīmīgi.
Secinājums: Balstoties uz pētījuma rezultātiem, tiek secināts, ka novērtēšanas instrumenta “Individuāli prioritizētu grūtību analīze” latviešu valodas versijai ir augsts ticamības līmenis ergoterapeitu praksē.
Actuality: There are lots of available standardized assessments in clinical practice, but a few of them are specifically designed to assess the outcome or effectiveness of use of assistive technology. Assessment “Individually Prioritised Problem Analysis (IPPA)” is a general measure of effectiveness that can be used to assess the effectiveness of assisstive technology sevices for people with disability. Objective of the study: To verify the assessment “Individually Prioritised Problem Analysis (IPPA)” for reliability testing of the Latvian version through occupational therapy practice. Research methodology: Quantitative, non-experimental descriptive study. During the research process, Latvian version of the assessment tool “Analysis of Individually Priority Difficulties” was prepared and the level of reliability was checked through occupational therapy practice Cohen’s d effect size was used to check the reliability of the assessment tool. Participants: The study involved 36 participants, 75 % of whom were recipients of rehabilitation center services and 25 % recipients of assistive technology centre services. The median age of the participants was 65,31 years (SD = 16,34). Assessment tools: Socialdemographic, assessment “Individualy Prioritised Problem Analysis (IPPA)” (Ozoliņa, V., Liepiņa, Z., 2021). Research outcome: Cohen’s d effect size was determined for two groups of activities – mobility (Cohen’s d = 2,09) and self-care (Cohen’s d = 3,69) activities. It was not determined for other groups of activities, because their data were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Results of the study proved that the Latvian version of the assessment tool “Individually Prioritised Problem Analysis” has a high level of reliability in the practice of occupational therapists.
Actuality: There are lots of available standardized assessments in clinical practice, but a few of them are specifically designed to assess the outcome or effectiveness of use of assistive technology. Assessment “Individually Prioritised Problem Analysis (IPPA)” is a general measure of effectiveness that can be used to assess the effectiveness of assisstive technology sevices for people with disability. Objective of the study: To verify the assessment “Individually Prioritised Problem Analysis (IPPA)” for reliability testing of the Latvian version through occupational therapy practice. Research methodology: Quantitative, non-experimental descriptive study. During the research process, Latvian version of the assessment tool “Analysis of Individually Priority Difficulties” was prepared and the level of reliability was checked through occupational therapy practice Cohen’s d effect size was used to check the reliability of the assessment tool. Participants: The study involved 36 participants, 75 % of whom were recipients of rehabilitation center services and 25 % recipients of assistive technology centre services. The median age of the participants was 65,31 years (SD = 16,34). Assessment tools: Socialdemographic, assessment “Individualy Prioritised Problem Analysis (IPPA)” (Ozoliņa, V., Liepiņa, Z., 2021). Research outcome: Cohen’s d effect size was determined for two groups of activities – mobility (Cohen’s d = 2,09) and self-care (Cohen’s d = 3,69) activities. It was not determined for other groups of activities, because their data were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Results of the study proved that the Latvian version of the assessment tool “Individually Prioritised Problem Analysis” has a high level of reliability in the practice of occupational therapists.
Description
Ergoterapija
Occupational Therapy
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care
Occupational Therapy
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care
Keywords
Ergoterapija, tehniskie palīglīdzekļi, tehnisko palīglīdzekļu pakalpojums, novērtēšanas instruments “Individuāli Prioritizētu grūtību analīze (IPGA)”., Occupational therapy, assistive technology, assistive technology service, assessment “Individualy Prioritised Problem Analysis (IPPA)”.