Jilkine, VladimirMg. iur. Doctorant of Law, Counsel, Finland2020-01-282020-01-282015Socrates: Rīgas Stradiņa universitātes Juridiskās fakultātes elektroniskais juridisko zinātnisko rakstu žurnāls. Rīga, RSU, 2015, Nr. 3 (3). 54.–65. lpp.2256-054854–65http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/979The article deals with the basis and procedure for review of court decisions that have entered into force, after the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights on violations of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in review of the cases by the Supreme Court of Finland, in connection with the decision by which the applicant appealed to The European Court of Human Rights. The author’s analysis and comparison of judicial practice and the European legal system shows that when making decisions, the Supreme Court applies current national constitutional and legislative provisions.Electronicen-USAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/European Court of Human Rightshuman rightsthe convictionthe international lawinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.25143/socr.03.2015.3.54-65