Kristiņa-Everte, IlutaPaiča, IneseMārtinsone, KristīneLubkina, VeltaMārtinsone, KristīneŠneidere, Kristīne2021-05-312021-05-312021Kristiņa-Everte, I, Paiča, I & Mārtinsone, K 2021, Emociju regulācijas prasmju aptaujas adaptācija latviešu valodā. in V Lubkina, K Mārtinsone & K Šneidere (eds), Sabiedrība. Integrācija. Izglītība = Society. Integration. Education : starptautiskās zinātniskās konferences materiāli = proceedings of the international scientific conference. vol. 7 : Psiholoģija, Society. Integration. Education=Sabiedrība. Integrācija. Izglītība, Rēzeknes Tehnoloģiju akadēmija, Rēzekne, pp. 146 - 158, International Scientific Conference “Society. Integration. Education: Sabiedrība. Integrācija. Izglītība”, 2021, Rēzekne, Latvia, 28/05/21. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol7.6227conference1691-5887https://dspace.rsu.lv/jspui/handle/123456789/4599The aim of this study was to carry out the adaption of the Latvian version of the Emotion Regulation Skills Questionnaire (ERSQ-27)(SEK-27, Berking & Znoj, 2008) for adults witch evaluates nine dimensions of emotion regulation skills. The questionnaire was completed by 376 adults (82% women and 18% men), aged 18 – 69 years (M = 31.2, SD = 12.99). The calculations for the adapted questionnaire were made for the Cronbach’s alpha, test-retest reliability and determination of the convergent and factorial validity. The five-factor solution proposed by the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was tested and compared with the theoretically postulated nine-factor solution using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The nine-factor model results in the Latvian version questionnaire explain 72% of varienace, but five-factors – 59.76%. The results for EFA and CFA were both higher in the nine-factor model. The internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach’s alpha) of the scales varied from 0.64 to 0.82, test-retest correlations ranged between 0.82 – 0.94. Similar results of the factor analysis were found in other research studies. Findings from this study showed significant evidence for the reliability and validity of the ERSQ-27 and it would be advisable to continue using it in scientific research.257481lavinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessemotion regulationemotion regulation skillsemotion regulation skills questionnaireERSQ-27psychometric propertiesreliabilityvalidity5.1 Psychology3.1. Articles or chapters in proceedings/scientific books indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontobookanthology/conference10.17770/sie2021vol7.6227https://www-webofscience-com.db.rsu.lv/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000833417500011http://journals.rta.lv/index.php/SIE/article/view/6227/5319