Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.23.2022.2.183-193
Title: Defence of Rule-Deductivism
Authors: Musts, Jānis
University of Latvia
Keywords: Socrates 2022, 2 (23);legal syllogism;rule-deductivism;teleological correction
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Citation: Musts, J. (2022). Defence of Rule-Deductivism. Electronic Scientific Journal of Law Socrates, 2 (23). 183–193. https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.23.2022.2.183-193
Series/Report no.: Socrates 2022, 2 (23)
Abstract: Many legal theorists subscribe to the claim that the legal syllogism has a role in justification of legal decisions. A challenge to this thesis is put forward in Luis Duarte d’Almeida’s essay “On the Legal Syllogism”. This article aims to examine Luis Duarte d’Almeida’s arguments against rule-deductivism in order to refine the theoretical understanding of the role that the legal syllogism has in the justification of legal decisions. In this article, three main research methods have been used: the descriptive, the deductive, and the analytical method. The examination of Luis Duarte d’Almeida’s arguments against rule-deductivism results in several conclusions. Firstly, the general argument against rule-deductivism fails because of some faulty assumptions about the scope of the major premise in respect to the scope of the statutory rule entailed by its ratio legis, i.e. that this adherence must be perfect when the judge is expanding the scope of the statutory rule by referring to the general purpose of the rule. Secondly, the critique of the first notion of rule-deductivism is effective, but only insofar as one also adheres to several contentious assumptions that are held by some rule-deductivists, but are not essential to rule-deductivism.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.23.2022.2.183-193
ISSN: 2256-0548
License URI: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Appears in Collections:Socrates. 2022, 2 (23)

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Socrates-23_14_Musts-Jaanis_183-193.pdf715.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Openopen_acces_unlocked


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons