Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.20.2021.2.212-231
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLoseviča, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorBundža, Oskars-
dc.contributor.authorKudeikina, Inga-
dc.contributor.otherLatvijas Universitāte, Medicīnas fakultāte, Latvijalv_LV
dc.contributor.otherSIA “Cēsu klīnika”, Garīgās veselības centrs, Latvijalv_LV
dc.contributor.otherRīgas Stradiņa universitāte, Juridiskā fakultāte, Latvijalv_LV
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-09T14:42:50Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-09T14:42:50Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationLoseviča, M., Bundža, O., Kudeikina, I. (2021). Piespiedu ārstēšana kā valsts pārvaldes uzdevums jeb kas ir kopīgs tifozajai Mērijai un Trakajam Ludvigam (Eng. Compulsory Treatment as Task of Public Governance or What Thyphoid Mary and Mad King Ludwig Had in Common: Abstract). Socrates. 2(20). 212–231. https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.20.2021.2.212-231lv_LV
dc.identifier.issn2256-0548-
dc.identifier.other212–231-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.rsu.lv/jspui/handle/123456789/6280-
dc.description.abstractThe article concerns involuntary treatment of infectious and mental diseases. Development of the legal regulation since the 19th century has been described here. Quality of the existing legal regulation has also been evaluated. Issues of involuntary psychiatric treatment have been analysed and demonstrated by the international case-law and state court practice. Significant differences between legislation in mental and infectious diseases has been detected, as well as differences have been traced between legal standards in the area of involuntary placement and involuntary treatment of mental disorders in Latvia and other countries. It has been concluded that involuntary psychiatric treatment, in line with epidemiological safety, is a task of public governance in the area of domestic security and safeguarding of human rights and it has to be reinforced by governmental authority. Thus, proposal of elaboration of the corresponding law has been made.en
dc.formatElectronic-
dc.language.isolv_LV-
dc.publisherRīga Stradiņš Universityen
dc.publisherRīgas Stradiņa universitātelv_LV
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSocrates 2021, 2 (20)-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectSocrates 2021, 2 (20)-
dc.subjectcompulsory measure of medical natureen
dc.subjecthuman rightsen
dc.subjectinfectious diseasesen
dc.subjectinvoluntary treatmenten
dc.subjectmental diseasesen
dc.subjectstate coercive poweren
dc.titlePiespiedu ārstēšana kā valsts pārvaldes uzdevums jeb kas ir kopīgs tifozajai Mērijai un Trakajam Ludvigamlv_LV
dc.title.alternativeCompulsory Treatment as Task of Public Governance or What Thyphoid Mary and Mad King Ludwig Had in Common (Abstract)en
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.25143/socr.20.2021.2.212-231-
Appears in Collections:Socrates. 2021, 2 (20)

Files in This Item:


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons