Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: 10.1186/s13054-018-2241-4
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCENTER-TBI investigators and participants-
dc.contributor.authorAuslands, Kaspars-
dc.contributor.authorZīverte, Agate-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-13T09:55:01Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-13T09:55:01Z-
dc.date.issued2018-11-16-
dc.identifier.citationCENTER-TBI investigators and participants , Auslands , K & Zīverte , A 2018 , ' Brain death and postmortem organ donation : report of a questionnaire from the CENTER-TBI study ' , Critical Care , vol. 22 , no. 1 , pp. 306 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2241-4-
dc.identifier.issn1364-8535-
dc.identifier.otherPubMedCentral: PMC6240295-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.rsu.lv/jspui/handle/123456789/4232-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the extent of the agreement on practices around brain death and postmortem organ donation. METHODS: Investigators from 67 Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study centers completed several questionnaires (response rate: 99%). RESULTS: Regarding practices around brain death, we found agreement on the clinical evaluation (prerequisites and neurological assessment) for brain death determination (BDD) in 100% of the centers. However, ancillary tests were required for BDD in 64% of the centers. BDD for nondonor patients was deemed mandatory in 18% of the centers before withdrawing life-sustaining measures (LSM). Also, practices around postmortem organ donation varied. Organ donation after circulatory arrest was forbidden in 45% of the centers. When withdrawal of LSM was contemplated, in 67% of centers the patients with a ventricular drain in situ had this removed, either sometimes or all of the time. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed both agreement and some regional differences regarding practices around brain death and postmortem organ donation. We hope our results help quantify and understand potential differences, and provide impetus for current dialogs toward further harmonization of practices around brain death and postmortem organ donation.en
dc.format.extent438626-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.relation.ispartofCritical Care-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.subjectBrain Death-
dc.subjectBrain Injuries, Traumatic/complications-
dc.subjectEurope-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectInternationality-
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires-
dc.subjectTissue and Organ Procurement/legislation & jurisprudence-
dc.subjectTrauma Centers/organization & administration-
dc.subject3.2 Clinical medicine-
dc.subject1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database-
dc.titleBrain death and postmortem organ donation : report of a questionnaire from the CENTER-TBI studyen
dc.type/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13054-018-2241-4-
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed-
Appears in Collections:Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Brain_death_and_postmortem_organ.pdf428.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Openopen_acces_unlocked


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.