Korelācija starp pusaudžu un vecāku komunikācijas līmeni un somatizācijas līmeni pusaudžiem ar organisku un funkcionālu patoloģiju
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīga Stradiņš University
Abstract
Atslēgvārdi: pusaudžu un vecāku komunikācija, pusaudžu somatizācija
Ievads: Viens no svarīgākajiem labvēlīgas ģimenes vides veidojošiem faktoriem ir komunikācija starp vecākiem un bērniem. Kvalitatīva un atklāta komunikācija starp vecākiem un pusaudžiem ir būtiska pusaudžu fiziskajai un psihiskajai veselībai. Vecākiem jāiemāca saviem bērniem emocijas verbalizēt, lai neveidotos somatizācija pusaudžu vecumā.
Mērķis: Izpētīt, vai ir korelācija starp pusaudžu un vecāku komunikācijas līmeni un somatizācijas līmeni pusaudžiem ar organisku un funkcionālu patoloģiju.
Metodes: Šķērsgriezuma pētījums, kurā tika aptaujāti Bērnu klīniskās universitātes slimnīcas pacienti vecumā no 11 līdz 18 gadiem. Anketā tika ietverti jautājumi par demogrāfiskajiem datiem – vecumu, dzimumu, ģimenes struktūru. Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS) tika izmantota, lai noteiktu vecāku un pusaudžu komunikācijas līmeni, savukārt Somatization Inventory-24 (SCI-24) skala tika izmantota, lai noteiktu somatizācijas līmeni. Bērnu klīniskās universitātes slimnīcas elektroniskās medicīniskās dokumentācijas datubāze “Andromeda” tika izmantota, lai iegūtu datus par pacientu veiktajiem izmeklējumiem un diagnozēm pēc Starptautiskās statistiskās slimību un veselības problēmu klasifikācijas 10. redakcijas (SSK-10). Iegūto datu apkopošana un apstrāde tika veikta, izmantojot MS Excel un IBM SPSS 23.0 versijas statistikas programmu.
Rezultāti: Pētījumā kopumā iekļauti 53 pacienti, no kuriem 62,3% (n=33) sieviešu dzimuma un 37,7% (n=20) vīriešu dzimuma. Netika konstatēta statistiski nozīmīga atšķirība komunikācijas līmenim starp pacientiem ar organisku un funkcionālu patoloģiju (p>0,05). Tika konstatēta statistiski nozīmīga komunikācijas līmeņa atšķirība starp vecuma grupām (p<0,05). Komunikācijas līmeņa mediāna (Q1; Q3) vecuma grupā no 11 – 13 gadiem ir 77,00 (71,00; 82,75), bet vecuma grupā no 14 – 17 gadiem 68,0 (60,0; 73,0). Tika konstatēta statistiski nozīmīga atšķirība somatizācijas līmenim starp dzimumiem (p<0,05). Mediāna (Q1; Q3) somatizācijas līmenim vīriešu dzimuma pacientiem 14,00 (6,25; 20,75) un sieviešu dzimuma pacientēm 23,00 (18,89; 30,13). Tika konstatēta nozīmīga somatizācijas līmeņa atšķirība starp endokrinoloģijas nodaļas un reimatoloģijas nodaļas pacientiem (p<0,05). Somatizācijas līmeņa mediāna (Q1; Q3) endokrinoloģijas nodaļas pacientiem ir 14,00 (6,75; 23,50), bet reimatoloģijas nodaļas pacientiem 22,00 (19,00; 35,13). Netika konstatēta statistiski nozīmīga korelācija starp komunikācijas līmeni un somatizācijas līmeni (p>0,05).
Secinājumi: Vecāku un pusaudžu komunikācijas līmenis neietekmē somatizācijas līmeni pusaudžiem ar organisku un funkcionālu patoloģiju.
Key words: adolescent and parent communication, adolescent somatization Introduction: One of the most important factors that creates a favourable family environment is communication between parents and children. Open, high quality communication between parents and adolescents is important to adolescent physical and psychological health. Parents need to teach their children how to verbalize emotions, so that somatization does not develop during adolescence. Aim: Investigate if there is a correlation between adolescent and parent communication level and somatization level for adolescents with organic and functional pathology. Methods: A cross-sectional research was performed. The respondents of the study were patients ages 11 to 18 of Children’s Clinical University Hospital of Latvia. Survey consisted of questions about demographical data – age, gender, family structure. Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS) was used to measure parent-adolescent communication. Children’s Somatization Inventory (CSI-24) was used to measure somatization level. Children’s Clinical University Hospital electronical documentation database “Andromeda” was used to gather information about patient examination results and diagnosis which were based on International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10). The obtained data was compiled and analysed using MS Excel and IBM SPSS 23.0 Statistics software. Results: The study involved 53 patients of which 62,3% (n=33) were female and 37,7% (n=20) were male. No statistically significant difference was found in communication level for patients with organic and functional pathologies (p>0,05). Statistically significant difference in communication level was found between age groups (p<0,05). Communication level median (Q1; Q3) for age group 11 – 13 is 77,00 (71,00; 82,75), but ages 14 – 17 is 68,0 (50,0; 73,0). Statistically significant difference was found for somatization level between the genders (p<0,05). Median (Q1; Q3) somatization level for males was 14,00 (6,25; 20,75) and females 23,00 (18,89; 30,13). Significant somatization level difference was found between patients from endocrinology department and rheumatology department (p<0,05). Somatization level median (Q1; Q3) for patients of endocrinology department is 14,00 (6,75; 23,50) and for rheumatology it is 22,00 (19,00; 35,13). No statistically significant correlation was found between communication level and somatization level (p>0,05). Conclusion: Parent and adolescent communication level does not affect the somatization level in adolescents with organic or functional pathologies.
Key words: adolescent and parent communication, adolescent somatization Introduction: One of the most important factors that creates a favourable family environment is communication between parents and children. Open, high quality communication between parents and adolescents is important to adolescent physical and psychological health. Parents need to teach their children how to verbalize emotions, so that somatization does not develop during adolescence. Aim: Investigate if there is a correlation between adolescent and parent communication level and somatization level for adolescents with organic and functional pathology. Methods: A cross-sectional research was performed. The respondents of the study were patients ages 11 to 18 of Children’s Clinical University Hospital of Latvia. Survey consisted of questions about demographical data – age, gender, family structure. Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS) was used to measure parent-adolescent communication. Children’s Somatization Inventory (CSI-24) was used to measure somatization level. Children’s Clinical University Hospital electronical documentation database “Andromeda” was used to gather information about patient examination results and diagnosis which were based on International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10). The obtained data was compiled and analysed using MS Excel and IBM SPSS 23.0 Statistics software. Results: The study involved 53 patients of which 62,3% (n=33) were female and 37,7% (n=20) were male. No statistically significant difference was found in communication level for patients with organic and functional pathologies (p>0,05). Statistically significant difference in communication level was found between age groups (p<0,05). Communication level median (Q1; Q3) for age group 11 – 13 is 77,00 (71,00; 82,75), but ages 14 – 17 is 68,0 (50,0; 73,0). Statistically significant difference was found for somatization level between the genders (p<0,05). Median (Q1; Q3) somatization level for males was 14,00 (6,25; 20,75) and females 23,00 (18,89; 30,13). Significant somatization level difference was found between patients from endocrinology department and rheumatology department (p<0,05). Somatization level median (Q1; Q3) for patients of endocrinology department is 14,00 (6,75; 23,50) and for rheumatology it is 22,00 (19,00; 35,13). No statistically significant correlation was found between communication level and somatization level (p>0,05). Conclusion: Parent and adolescent communication level does not affect the somatization level in adolescents with organic or functional pathologies.
Description
Medicīna
Medicine
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care
Medicine
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care
Keywords
Atslēgvārdi: pusaudžu un vecāku komunikācija, pusaudžu somatizācija, Key words: adolescent and parent communication, adolescent somatization