Dažādu fizioterapijas tehniku pielietošana pacientu ar mugurkaula kakla daļas sāpēm un galvas protrakciju populācijā: sistemātisks literatūras pārskats
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīga Stradiņš University
Abstract
Darba nosaukums: Dažādu fizioterapijas tehniku pielietošana pacientu ar mugurkaula kakla daļas sāpēm un galvas protrakciju populācijā: sistemātisks literatūras pārskats.
Pamatojums: Mugurkaula kakla daļas sāpes ir bieža parādība populācijā, kas var ietekmēt dzīves kvalitāti, spējas brīvi izpildīt ikdienas aktivitātes un ietekmē indivīda darbspējas. Literatūras avotos pieminēts 86% incindence populācijā.
Mūsdienās ir pieejamas plašs klāsts ar iespējamām, fizioterapeitiem pieejamām metodēm un tehnikām, kuru pamats ir sāpju novēršana, tā efekta saglabāšana un prevence.
Stiepšana, muskuļu stiprināšana, fizikālie faktori un to kombinācijas ir pamatmetodes, kuras izmanto fizioterapeiti, lai sasniegt pozitīvo iznākumu.
Mērķis: Apkopot un izanalizēt datus no zinātniskiem pētījumiem par mugurkaula kakla daļas sāpju ārstēšanas konservatīviem metodēm, kuri ir fizioterapeitu kompetenču lokā.
Metodes: Pētījuma dizains: sistemātisks literatūras pārskats; Izmantojamās datubāzes: Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EBRSR, EBSCOhost, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Research Gate;
Rezultāti: Tika atlasīti 3 pētījumi, kuros bija pielietotas aktīvās mobilizācijas tehnikas vai to kombinācijas, salīdzinot ar stiepšanās tehnikām vai to kombinācijām ar citām metodēm. Pētījumu rezultātos tika salīdzzināts efekts uz kustību apjomu, mugurkaula kakla daļas traucējumu un sāpju pakāpi. Visas pētījumos izmantotās metodes liecināja par to pozitīvo ietekmi uz izvelētiem parametriem. Aktīvas mobilizācijas tehnikas sniedza labākus rezultātus nekā stiepšana.
Secinājumi: Atlasīto pētījumu rezultāti liecina par to, ka mugurkaula kakla daļas muskuļu aktīvā mobilizācija vai to kombinācija ar citām metodēm ir efektīvāka nekā mugurkaula kakla daļas muskuļu stiepšana vai to kombinācija ar citām metodēm, mugurkaula kakla daļas sāpju ārstēšanā.
Title: Use of different physiotherapy methods for managing neck pain and head protraction in population: Systematic review. Background: cervical spine pain is a common phenomenon in the population that can affect the quality of life, the ability to perform daily activities freely and the effect on an individual's ability to work. The literature mentions 86% incidence in the population. Today, a wide range of possible methods and techniques available to physiotherapists are available, based on the prevention, maintenance and prevention of pain. Stretching, muscle strengthening, physical factors and their combinations are the basic methods used by physiotherapists to achieve a positive result. Objective: To collect and analyse data from scientific research on conservative methods of cervical spine pain, which are within the competence of physiotherapists. Methods: Research design: systematic literature review; Databases used: Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EBRSR, EBSCOhost, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Research Gate. Results: Three studies were selected, in which active mobilization techniques or their combinations were used in comparison with the stretching technique or their combinations with other methods. All the methods used in the studies showed their positive effect on the selected parameters. Active mobilization techniques gave the best results than stretching. Conclusion: The results of selected studies indicate that muscle active mobilization of the cervical spine or a combination thereof with other methods is more effective than stretching the muscles of the cervical spine or a combination thereof with other methods, cervical spine pain treatment.
Title: Use of different physiotherapy methods for managing neck pain and head protraction in population: Systematic review. Background: cervical spine pain is a common phenomenon in the population that can affect the quality of life, the ability to perform daily activities freely and the effect on an individual's ability to work. The literature mentions 86% incidence in the population. Today, a wide range of possible methods and techniques available to physiotherapists are available, based on the prevention, maintenance and prevention of pain. Stretching, muscle strengthening, physical factors and their combinations are the basic methods used by physiotherapists to achieve a positive result. Objective: To collect and analyse data from scientific research on conservative methods of cervical spine pain, which are within the competence of physiotherapists. Methods: Research design: systematic literature review; Databases used: Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EBRSR, EBSCOhost, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Research Gate. Results: Three studies were selected, in which active mobilization techniques or their combinations were used in comparison with the stretching technique or their combinations with other methods. All the methods used in the studies showed their positive effect on the selected parameters. Active mobilization techniques gave the best results than stretching. Conclusion: The results of selected studies indicate that muscle active mobilization of the cervical spine or a combination thereof with other methods is more effective than stretching the muscles of the cervical spine or a combination thereof with other methods, cervical spine pain treatment.
Description
Fizioterapija
Physiotherapy
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care
Physiotherapy
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care
Keywords
Atslēgas vārdi: Neck pain, stretching, strength, excersise., Keywords: Neck pain, stretching, strength, excersise.