Informācijas apstrādes ātruma saistība ar neirotisma dimensiju un kognitīvajām rezervēm gados vecākiem pieaugušajiem.
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīga Stradiņš University
Abstract
Pētījuma mērķis bija izpētīt saistību starp informācijas apstrādes ātrumu, neirotisma dimensiju un kognitīvajām rezervēm. Tika izvirzīti četri pētījuma jautājumi: Vai pastāv saistība starp informācijas apstrādes ātrumu un neirotisma dimensiju, starp kognitīvajām rezervēm un informācijas apstrādes ātrumu, neirotisma dimensiju un kognitīvajām rezervēm, kā arī, vai neirotisma dimensija darbojas kā mediators saistībā starp kognitīvajām rezervēm un informācijas apstrādes ātrumu.
Kopumā pētījumā piedalījās 70 dalībnieki. Pēc sociāli vēlamo atbilžu melu skalas, datu analīzē tika iekļauti 49 dalībnieki (72% sievietes), vecumā no 65 līdz 85 gadiem (M = 72,10, SD = 5,16). bez būtiskām pašu ziņotām saslimšanām, kas varētu liegt veikt objektīvu izpēti. Dati tika ievākti, izmantojot Latvijas Personības aptauju (Perepjolkina un Reņģe, 2014); “Kognitīvo rezervju indeksa" aptauju (Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire, CRIq, Nucci, Mapelli, & Mondini, 2012); Handbola vārtsargu reakcijas kontroli (Molotanovs, 2010). Datu ievākšana katram pētījuma dalībniekam notika divos posmos frontāli, katram dalībniekam individuāli.
Pētījuma rezultāti uzrādīja, ka nepastāv statistiski nozīmīga saistība starp neirotisma dimensiju un informācijas apstrādes ātrumu. Statistiski nozīmīgu vāju saistību uzrādīja informācijas apstrādes ātrumam un KRI-Darba pieredzei (attiecīgi rs = -0,31, p < 0,05). Pastāv statistiski nozīmīga negatīva vāja saistība starp KRI-Darba pieredzi un Neirotisma apakšskalu depresivitāte (rs = -0,35, p < 0,05), kā arī starp KRI-Brīvais laiks un nenoturība pret stresu (rs = -0,39, p < 0,01) un neirotisma dimensiju kopumā (rs = -0,40, p < 0,01). Rezultāti uzrāda arī negatīvu ciešu saistību starp kopējo KRI un neirotisma apakšskalu depresivitāte (rs = -0,37, p < 0,01). Apskatot, vai neirotisma dimensija darbojas kā mediators saistībā starp kognitīvajām rezervēm un informācijas apstrādes ātrumu tika veikta lineārā un hierarhiskā regresijas analīze, kas neuzrādīja statistiski nozīmīgas saistības (p = 0,335; p = 0,065) līdz ar to secinot, ka mediācijas modelis šajā izlasē starp mainīgajiem nedarbojas.
Pētījuma izstrādes laikā tika secināts, ka ar personības iezīmju palīdzību nevar prognozēt kognitīvo rezervju efektivitāti un līdz ar to informācijas apstrādes ātrumu šajā izlasē. Pētījuma rezultāti dod ieguldījumu sabiedrības veselīgas novecošanās kontekstā un kalpo par pamatu turpmākai psihiskās veselības izziņas jomā.
The aim of the study was to exsamine the relationship between information processing speed, the neuroticism dimension and cognitive reserves. Four research questions were stated. Firstly, to determine relationship between all three variables and, secondly,and does the neuroticism dimension act as a mediator between cognitive reserves and information processing speed. A total of 70 participants participated in the study. According to the scale of socially desired answers, 49 participants (72% women) aged 65 to 85 years (M = 72.10, SD = 5.16) were included in the data analysis. without significant self-reported diseases that could limit an objective study. Data were obtained with the Latvian Personality Survey (Perepjolkina & Reņģe, 2014); Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (CRIq, Nucci, Mapelli, & Mondini, 2012); Handball goalkeeper response controltest (Molotanov, 2010). Data were obtained frontally, for each participant individually and took place in two stages. There were no statistically significant relationship between the neuroticism dimension and the speed of information processing. There was a statistically significant weak relationship between information processing speed and KRI-Work experience (respectively rs = -.31, p < .05). There is a statistically significant negative weak relationship between KRI-Work experience and Neurotic subscale depression (rs = -.35, p < .05), as well as between KRI-Leisure time and stress insecurity (rs = -.39, p < .01) and the neurotic dimension in general (rs = -.40, p < .01). The results also show a negative close relationship between total CRI and neurotic subscale depression (rs = -.37, p < .01). To examine whether the neuroticism dimension acts as a mediator in the relationship between cognitive reserves and information processing speed, a linear and hierarchical regression analysis was performed that showed no statistically significant relationship (p = .335; p = .065) thus concluding that the mediation model in this sample among the variables does not work. During the development of the study, it was concluded that with the help of personality traits it is not possible to predict the efficiency of cognitive reserves and, consequently, the speed of information processing in this sample. The results of the research contribute to the context of healthy aging of the society and serve as a basis for further cognition of mental health.
The aim of the study was to exsamine the relationship between information processing speed, the neuroticism dimension and cognitive reserves. Four research questions were stated. Firstly, to determine relationship between all three variables and, secondly,and does the neuroticism dimension act as a mediator between cognitive reserves and information processing speed. A total of 70 participants participated in the study. According to the scale of socially desired answers, 49 participants (72% women) aged 65 to 85 years (M = 72.10, SD = 5.16) were included in the data analysis. without significant self-reported diseases that could limit an objective study. Data were obtained with the Latvian Personality Survey (Perepjolkina & Reņģe, 2014); Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (CRIq, Nucci, Mapelli, & Mondini, 2012); Handball goalkeeper response controltest (Molotanov, 2010). Data were obtained frontally, for each participant individually and took place in two stages. There were no statistically significant relationship between the neuroticism dimension and the speed of information processing. There was a statistically significant weak relationship between information processing speed and KRI-Work experience (respectively rs = -.31, p < .05). There is a statistically significant negative weak relationship between KRI-Work experience and Neurotic subscale depression (rs = -.35, p < .05), as well as between KRI-Leisure time and stress insecurity (rs = -.39, p < .01) and the neurotic dimension in general (rs = -.40, p < .01). The results also show a negative close relationship between total CRI and neurotic subscale depression (rs = -.37, p < .01). To examine whether the neuroticism dimension acts as a mediator in the relationship between cognitive reserves and information processing speed, a linear and hierarchical regression analysis was performed that showed no statistically significant relationship (p = .335; p = .065) thus concluding that the mediation model in this sample among the variables does not work. During the development of the study, it was concluded that with the help of personality traits it is not possible to predict the efficiency of cognitive reserves and, consequently, the speed of information processing in this sample. The results of the research contribute to the context of healthy aging of the society and serve as a basis for further cognition of mental health.
Description
Psiholoģija
Psychology
Psiholoģija
Psychology
Psychology
Psiholoģija
Psychology
Keywords
informācijas apstrādes ātrums, reakcijas laiks, neirotisms, kognitīvās rezerves, kognitīvie procesi, novecošanās, reaction time, information processing speed, cognitive processes, cognitive reserve, aging, neuroticism