Spiegošanas un valsts nodevības krimināltiesiskais regulējums nacionālās drošības kontekstā

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPlatace, Laura
dc.contributor.otherRīgas Stradiņa universitāte, Juridiskā fakultāte, Latvija
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-22T13:37:04Z
dc.date.available2020-01-22T13:37:04Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractApstākļos, kad valda ģeopolitiskais saspīlējums starp Rietumvalstīm un Krieviju, un apsteidzošas informācijas iegūšanas sāncensībā aktuāli kļūst spiegošanas un valsts nodevības noziegumi. Taču kopš neatkarības atjaunošanas Latvijā neviena persona nav notiesāta par spiegošanu. Spēkā esošais Krimināllikuma regulējums ir nepilnīgs un nepietiekams, lai aizsargātu nacionālās drošības intereses, jo Krimināllikums valsts nodevību par noziegumu neatzīst, līdz ar to spiegošanas tiesiskais regulējums ir novecojis un nav piemērots pašreizējai situācijai.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe geopolitical environment once again has brought tension between the West and Russia, and in this on-going informational competition such crimes as treason and espionage become topical issues. Four people have been convicted of treason in Estonia over the past six years, while in Lithuania three criminal proceedings for espionage where initiated last year alone. It is a large number for the Baltic States, considering difficulties to prove the mentioned crimes. However, no one has been convicted of espionage in Latvia since regaining of independence. In the article the author compares the existing criminal law of the three Baltic States to discover and analyse possible theoretical as well as practical problems in applying liability for acts of treason and espionage in Latvia. The author proves that the Criminal Law of the Republic of Latvia is incomplete and insufficient to protect national security interests – the Criminal Law does not “recognise” treason as crime, and the legal regulation of espionage is outdated and unsuitable for the present situation.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.identifier.citationSocrates: Rīgas Stradiņa universitātes Juridiskās fakultātes elektroniskais juridisko zinātnisko rakstu žurnāls. A. Vilka red. Rīga, RSU, 2015, Nr. 2 (2). 70.–83. lpp.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.25143/socr.02.2015.2.70-83
dc.identifier.issn2256-0548
dc.identifier.other70–83
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/953
dc.language.isolv_LV
dc.publisherRīgas Stradiņa universitāte / Rīga Stradiņš University
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSocrates 2015, 2 (2)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectspiegošana
dc.subjectvalsts nodevība
dc.subjectnacionālā drošība
dc.subjectārvalstu izlūkdienests
dc.subjectCriminal Law
dc.subjectespionage
dc.subjecttreason
dc.titleSpiegošanas un valsts nodevības krimināltiesiskais regulējums nacionālās drošības kontekstā
dc.title.alternativeCriminal Law on Espionage and Treason in the Baltic States
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
15-176_Socrates_2_2015_11_Platace_070-083_.pdf
Size:
207.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Socrates. 2015, 2 (2)