Sākumskolas skolotāju viedoklis par darba vides piemērotību un ergonomisko riska faktoru novērtējums darba vidē
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīga Stradiņš University
Abstract
Darba nosaukums: Sākumskolas skolotāju viedoklis par darba vides piemērotību un ergonomisko riska faktoru novērtējums darba vidē.
Darba autore: Laura Kristīne Bērtulsone.
Darba zinātniskais vadītājs: RSU Rehabilitācijas katedras stundu pasniedzēja Ilze Miķelsone.
Aktualitāte: ikdienā skolotāji ir pakļauti dažādiem riska faktoriem, neievērojot ergonomikas pamatprincipus. Neatbilstoša fiziskā vide ir viens no arodsaslimšanu veicinošiem faktoriem.
Mērķis: noskaidrot sākumskolas skolotāju viedokli par darba vides piemērotību un izvērtēt ergonomiskos riskus darba vidē.
Uzdevumi: izmantojot aptaujas anketu, noskaidrot sākumskolas skolotāju darba vides pašvērtējumu; novērtēt darba vides ergonomiskos riska faktorus pētījuma dalībnieku darba vidē; apkopot iegūtos datus un izdarīt secinājumus.
Pētījuma dizains: kvantitatīvs aprakstošs šķērsgriezuma pētījums.
Dalībnieki: 27 sākumskolas skolotājas no četrām izglītības iestādēm. Vidējais vecums 44 gadi (SD 2), vidējais darba stāžs 20 gadi (SD 4).
Instrumenti: anketēšanai izmantota “Skolas vides aptauja»; darba vides novērtēšana ar skrīninga novērtēšanas instrumentu “PLIBEL” (izmantojot tulkoto versiju latviešu valodā).
Pētījuma norise: aptaujas aizpildīšana un “PLIBEL” novērtēšana izglītības iestādē 1, aptaujas aizpildīšana izglītības iestādē 2, 3, 4. Kopumā datu ievākšana no visiem pētījuma dalībniekiem norisinājās sešas nedēļas.
Rezultāti: Visās izglītības iestādēs, dalībniecēm aizpildot aptauju, tika iegūta informācija, ka ir neatbilstoša gaisa temperatūra, gaisa kvalitāte, nepietiekams atpūtas brīžu garums, u.c. faktori. Izglītības iestādē 1, kurā tika veikta novērtēšana ar “PLIBEL”, rezultāti liecina, ka pastāv dažādi ergonomiskie riski.
Secinājumi: Pētījuma dalībnieku vērtējumi par darba vides piemērotību bija atšķirīgi, pozitīvāk vērtējot fizisko atbalsta vidi, bet negatīvāk fizisko mācību vidi, ar darbu saistītos procesus un mācību resursu nodrošinājumu. Var secināt, ka pētījuma dalībnieki, kuriem tika veikta gan aptauja, gan novērtēšana ar “PLIBEL” instrumentu darba vidē saskaras ar tādiem ergonomiskiem riska faktoriem, kā darba pienākumu veikšana ķermeņa uzbūvei neatbilstošā augstumā, ilgstošas un atkārtotas kustības locītavās, kas tiek veiktas statiskās un piespiedu pozās, kā arī ilgstošs redzes sasprindzinājums.
Title work: Opinion of primary school teachers about working environment suitability and assessment of ergonomic risk factors int the working environment. Academic Promoter: Laura Kristīne Bērtulsone. Scientific Head of Work: RSU, Department of Rehabilitation lecturer Ilze Miķelsone. Actuality: every day, teachers are exposed to a variety of risk factors without complying with basic principles of ergonomics. An inappropriate physical environment is one of the contributing factors to occupational disease. Aim: to clarify the opinion of primary school teachers on the appropriateness of the working environment and assess ergonomic risks in the working environment. Tasks: identify the self-assessment of the working environment of primary school teachers using a questionnaire; assess ergonomic risk factors in the working environment of study participants; collect the data obtained and draw conclusions. Type of work: quantitative descriptive cross – section study. Participants: 27 primary school teachers from four educational institutions. Average age 44 years (SD 2), average seniority 20 years (SD 4). Instruments: “School Environment Survey”; screening evaluation instrument “PLIBEL”. Conduct of the study: completion of the survey and assessment of “PLIBEL” in the educational establishment 1, completion of the survey in the educational establishment 2,3,4. Overall, data collection from all participants took place for six weeks. Results: Four educational establishments, the survey was completed by participants showed that there were inadequate air temperature, air quality, insufficient rest times, etc. factors. At the educational establishment 1, where a “PLIBEL” assessment was carried out, the results show that there are different ergonomic risks. Conclusions: The assessments of the subjects on the appropriateness of the working environment were different, with a more positive assessment of the physical support environment, but a more negative physical learning environment, work – releated processes and the provision of learning resources. It can be concluded that participants in the study who were both surveyed and evaluated with the “PLIBEL” instrument in the working environment face ergonomic risk factors such as the performance of work duties at a height not appropriate to the body structure, continuous and repetitive joints performed in static positions, etc.
Title work: Opinion of primary school teachers about working environment suitability and assessment of ergonomic risk factors int the working environment. Academic Promoter: Laura Kristīne Bērtulsone. Scientific Head of Work: RSU, Department of Rehabilitation lecturer Ilze Miķelsone. Actuality: every day, teachers are exposed to a variety of risk factors without complying with basic principles of ergonomics. An inappropriate physical environment is one of the contributing factors to occupational disease. Aim: to clarify the opinion of primary school teachers on the appropriateness of the working environment and assess ergonomic risks in the working environment. Tasks: identify the self-assessment of the working environment of primary school teachers using a questionnaire; assess ergonomic risk factors in the working environment of study participants; collect the data obtained and draw conclusions. Type of work: quantitative descriptive cross – section study. Participants: 27 primary school teachers from four educational institutions. Average age 44 years (SD 2), average seniority 20 years (SD 4). Instruments: “School Environment Survey”; screening evaluation instrument “PLIBEL”. Conduct of the study: completion of the survey and assessment of “PLIBEL” in the educational establishment 1, completion of the survey in the educational establishment 2,3,4. Overall, data collection from all participants took place for six weeks. Results: Four educational establishments, the survey was completed by participants showed that there were inadequate air temperature, air quality, insufficient rest times, etc. factors. At the educational establishment 1, where a “PLIBEL” assessment was carried out, the results show that there are different ergonomic risks. Conclusions: The assessments of the subjects on the appropriateness of the working environment were different, with a more positive assessment of the physical support environment, but a more negative physical learning environment, work – releated processes and the provision of learning resources. It can be concluded that participants in the study who were both surveyed and evaluated with the “PLIBEL” instrument in the working environment face ergonomic risk factors such as the performance of work duties at a height not appropriate to the body structure, continuous and repetitive joints performed in static positions, etc.
Description
Ergoterapija
Occupational Therapy
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care
Occupational Therapy
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care
Keywords
Ergonomikas pamatprincipi, sākumskolas skolotāji, fiziskā darba vide sākumskolā, u.c., Basic principles of ergonomics, primary school teachers, physical working environment in primary school, etc.