Veselības aprūpes finansēšana un mediķu atalgojums – diskurss plašsaziņas portālos (2019-2020)
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīga Stradiņš University
Abstract
Bakalaura darbs „Veselības aprūpes finansēšana un mediķu atalgojums –
diskurss plašsaziņas portālos (2019–2020)” pēta diskursa konstruēšanu triju Latvijas
populārāko mediju publikācijās par veselības aprūpes un mediķu algu tēmu no 2019.
gada līdz 2020. gadam. Šī mērķa sasniegšanai izmantota kritiskā diskursa analīze.
Pētījuma teorētiskais rāmējums ietver dažādas teorētiķu idejas par diskursa konceptu,
kritiskā diskursa analīzes pamatelementiem un varas diskursa pazīmēm. Pētījuma
galvenais fokuss ir valodas iezīmes publikācijās, kurās parādās dažādu diskursa aktoru
viedokļi. Empīrisko datu ieguvei ir izmantota kvantitatīvās kontentanalīzes metode.
Pēc pētījuma veikšanas tiek secināts, ka gan mediķi, gan politiķi izmanto varas
diskursa elementus, sniedzot viedokļus plašsaziņas portālos. Varas diskursa elementu
izmantošana neveicina savstarpējo komunikāciju starp diskursa aktoriem un traucē
objektīvas informācijas sniegšanu sabiedrībai. Dažādi diskursi tekstā spēj parādīt
galvenās iezīmes, kas, iespējams, palēnina komunikatīvās problēmas uzlabošanos. Šajā
pētījumā tika pierādīts, ka gan politiķi, gan mediķi izmanto dažāda veida diskursus, kas
ne tikai norāda uz diskursa aktoru vēlmi dominēt, bet arī neiecietību un neizpratni par
otras grupas darbības mērķiem, uzdevumiem un vērtībām.
Bachelor's work "Healthcare funding and medical remuneration – discourse in the media portals (2019-2020)" explores the construction of discourse in three of Latvia's most popular media portals publications about the topic of healthcare and medical salaries from 2019 to 2020. Critical discourse analysis is used to achieve main goal of the bachelor’s work. The theoretical frame of the study includes various theorists ideas about the concept of discourse, the basic elements of critical discourse analysis and the characteristics of power discourse. The main focus of the study is the features of the language in publications, in which the opinions of various actors of the discourse appear. The method of quantitative contentanalysis has been used to obtain empirical data. After conducting the research, it is concluded that both medics and politicians use elements of power discourse when providing there opinions on media portals. The use of elements of the power discourse doesn’t facilitate mutual communication between the actors of the discourse and interferes with the provision of objective information to the public.Various discourses in the text shows the main features that allegedly slow down the improvement of the communicative problem. In this study, it was shown that both politicians and medics use different types of discourse, which not only indicates the desire of discourse actors to dominate, but also intolerance and lack of understanding of the goals, objectives and values of the other group.
Bachelor's work "Healthcare funding and medical remuneration – discourse in the media portals (2019-2020)" explores the construction of discourse in three of Latvia's most popular media portals publications about the topic of healthcare and medical salaries from 2019 to 2020. Critical discourse analysis is used to achieve main goal of the bachelor’s work. The theoretical frame of the study includes various theorists ideas about the concept of discourse, the basic elements of critical discourse analysis and the characteristics of power discourse. The main focus of the study is the features of the language in publications, in which the opinions of various actors of the discourse appear. The method of quantitative contentanalysis has been used to obtain empirical data. After conducting the research, it is concluded that both medics and politicians use elements of power discourse when providing there opinions on media portals. The use of elements of the power discourse doesn’t facilitate mutual communication between the actors of the discourse and interferes with the provision of objective information to the public.Various discourses in the text shows the main features that allegedly slow down the improvement of the communicative problem. In this study, it was shown that both politicians and medics use different types of discourse, which not only indicates the desire of discourse actors to dominate, but also intolerance and lack of understanding of the goals, objectives and values of the other group.
Description
Sabiedriskās attiecības
Public Relations
Informācijas un komunikācijas zinātnes
Information and Communication Sciences
Public Relations
Informācijas un komunikācijas zinātnes
Information and Communication Sciences
Keywords
diskurss, kritiskā diskursa analīze, varas diskurss, mediķi, politiķi, discourse, critical discourse analysis, power discourse, medics, politicians