Ekspertu atzinuma kriminālprocesā novērtēšana
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2018
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīga Stradiņš University
Abstract
Dr. iur. M. Sumbarova analizē eksperta atzinuma novērtēšanas problēmas kriminālprocesā. Var piekrist zinātnieces viedoklim, ka eksperta atzinumam ir tikai tam raksturīgas izvērtēšanas īpatnības, kas ietekmē tā ticamību un ir cieši saistītas ar pirmstiesas un tiesas kriminālprocesa kvalitāti.
Dr. iur. M. Sumbarova analyses the problems of assessment of expert opinion during criminal trial. One can agree with the opinion of the scientist that expert opinion has its unique assessment characteristics which affect the credibility and are closely connected with the quality of pre-trial and judicial criminal proceedings.
Dr. iur. M. Sumbarova analyses the problems of assessment of expert opinion during criminal trial. One can agree with the opinion of the scientist that expert opinion has its unique assessment characteristics which affect the credibility and are closely connected with the quality of pre-trial and judicial criminal proceedings.
Description
Keywords
kriminālprocess, Kriminālprocesa likums, eksperta atzinums, pierādījums, kriminālistika, criminal procedure, Criminal Procedure law, expert opinion, evidence, forensics
Citation
Socrates: Rīgas Stradiņa universitātes Juridiskās fakultātes elektroniskais juridisko zinātnisko rakstu žurnāls = Rīga Stradiņš University Faculty of Law Electronic Scientific Journal of Law. Rīga: RSU, 2018, Nr. 1 (10). 39.–44. lpp.