Challenge of Advocate’s Profession in the Age of Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing and Proliferation Evasion “Not to slip with a fragile burden!”
| dc.contributor.author | Joksta, Sandra | |
| dc.contributor.other | Joint Stock Company “Latvijas Gāze”, Latvia | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-29T12:40:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-12-29T12:40:54Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Ability to perform advocate’s duty is irrevocably linked to advocate’s immunity concept. The article provides an insight about the scope of advocate’s immunity concept in the age of money laundering. The purpose of it is to analyse the modern tendency to overstep the red lines guarding this concept, when applying legal enactments for money laundering evasion purposes. In the article, the judgment of 19 November 2020 in case “Klaus Mueller vs Germany” made by European Court of Human Rights, is analysed, where the issue of advocate’s immunity was considered in joint connection with the Clause 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The sometimes-exaggerated need for transparency at all costs conflicts with privacy protection aspects of individuals. Legislative enactments of money laundering and terrorism financing and proliferation evasion systemically contradicts Law of Advocacy and causes collision with other norms of higher legal rank such as fundamental rights enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights to fair trial and justice and rights to choose an occupation and engage in work. | en |
| dc.format | Electronic | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Joksta, S. (2021). Challenge of Advocate’s Profession in the Age of Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing and Proliferation Evasion “Not to slip with a fragile burden!”. Electronic Scientific Journal of Law Socrates, 3 (21). 139–148. https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.21.2021.3.139-148 | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.21.2021.3.139-148 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2256-0548 | |
| dc.identifier.other | 139–148 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.rsu.lv/jspui/handle/123456789/7137 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Rīga Stradiņš University | en |
| dc.publisher | Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte | lv_LV |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Socrates 2021, 3 (21) | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | Socrates 2021, 3 (21) | |
| dc.subject | advocate’s immunity concept | en |
| dc.subject | advocate’s rights to professional secret and confidentiality | en |
| dc.subject | legal certainty | en |
| dc.subject | money laundering and terrorism financing and proliferation evasion | en |
| dc.subject | principle of sound legislation | en |
| dc.subject | uncertain privilege | en |
| dc.title | Challenge of Advocate’s Profession in the Age of Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing and Proliferation Evasion “Not to slip with a fragile burden!” | en |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- Socrates-21-09_Joksta_139-148.pdf
- Size:
- 136.4 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format