Finding a path in a methodological jungle : a qualitative research of resilience

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorZelčāne, Elīna
dc.contributor.authorPipere, Anita
dc.contributor.institutionDepartment of Health Psychology and Paedagogy
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-11T09:40:01Z
dc.date.available2023-01-11T09:40:01Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-05
dc.descriptionFunding Information: This work was not supported by external funding. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.description.abstractQualitative research provides an in-depth understanding of lived experiences. However, these experiences can be hard to apprehend by using just one method of data analysis. A good example is the experience of resilience. In this paper, the authors describe the chain of the decision-making process in the research of the construct of “resilience”. s The authors justify the implications of a multi-method, pluralistic approach, and show how the triangulation of two or more qualitative methods and integration of several qualitative data analysis methods can improve a deeper understanding of the resilience among people with chronic pain. By combining the thematic analysis, narrative analysis, and critical incident technique, lived experiences can be seen from different perspectives. Therefore, the thematic analysis describes the content and answers to “what” regarding resilience, the narrative analysis describes the dynamics of resilience, and answers to “how”, while the critical incident technique clarifies the most significant experience and the answers to “why” changes happen. This integrative approach could be used in the analysis of other psychological constructs and can serve as an example of how the rigour of qualitative research could be provided.en
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.format.extent1029702
dc.identifier.citationZelčāne, E & Pipere, A 2023, 'Finding a path in a methodological jungle : a qualitative research of resilience', International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, vol. 18, no. 1, 2164948. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2023.2164948
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17482631.2023.2164948
dc.identifier.issn1748-2623
dc.identifier.otherMendeley: 65418995-628c-3072-bc6c-2c40ce52a342
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.rsu.lv/jspui/handle/123456789/10066
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145645706&partnerID=8YFLogxK
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/65418995-628c-3072-bc6c-2c40ce52a342/
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCritical incident technique
dc.subjectchronic pain
dc.subjectmulti-method
dc.subjectnarrative analysis
dc.subjectqualitative research
dc.subjectpluralism
dc.subjectresilience
dc.subjectthematic analysis
dc.subject5.1 Psychology
dc.subject1.1. Scientific article indexed in Web of Science and/or Scopus database
dc.titleFinding a path in a methodological jungle : a qualitative research of resilienceen
dc.type/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Finding_a_path_in_a_methodological_jungle_a_qualitative_research_of_resilience.pdf
Size:
1005.57 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure