Contract for Work (locatio conductio operis) of Transportation and Rustic Praedial Servitude of Way (servitus viae) as Roman Law Institutions for Needs of Rural Logistics
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Abstract
The article deals with the results of the authors’ research performed on original sources of Roman Law with reference to legal constructions concerning various types of logistics challenges related to agricultural production and residence in rural areas. Provision of transportation services was regulated by means of a contract for work (locatio conductio operis) – an agreement according to which a contractor / employee as a lessee (conductor, redemptor operis) had obligations to fulfil services or certain work on or from the material supplied by the commissioning party / employer / lessor (locator). An agreement on transportation of goods or passengers was also considered to be a contract for work. A smart answer to infrastructure challenges was the so-called rustic praedial servitudes (servitutes praediorum rusticorum), including a servitude of way / road (via), which granted the owner of a parcel of land non-adjacent to a public road (via publica) the right to use the road over a parcel of land belonging to another owner, thus gaining access to the public road. The legal framework of a Roman contract for work of transportation and the rustic praedial servitude of way / road must be recognised as a rather effective solution for challenges of rural logistics at the time.
Description
Keywords
Socrates 2021, 3 (21), contract for work of transportation, servitude of way, Roman Law, rural logistics
Citation
Apsītis, A., Tarasova, D., Dinsberga, J., Joksts, J. (2021). Contract for Work (locatio conductio operis) of Transportation and Rustic Praedial Servitude of Way (servitus viae) as Roman Law Institutions for Needs of Rural Logistics. Electronic Scientific Journal of Law Socrates, 3 (21). 234–243. https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.21.2021.3.234-243