Comparación entre el examen radiográfico y el visual-táctil para detectar y valorar caries dental interproximal

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMartignon, Stefania
dc.contributor.authorUribe, Sergio E.
dc.contributor.authorPulido, Ana María
dc.contributor.authorCortés, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorMartínez, Luis Fernando Gamboa
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-16T21:02:58Z
dc.date.available2022-08-16T21:02:58Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractBackground: The optimal management of a caries lesion involves a precise and reliablediagnosis along with an appropriate treatment decision. The traditional diagnostic methodcontinues being the visual-tactile and it is focused in the detection of cavitated lesions.Currently, caries classification systems that include the early caries lesions and allow fornon-operative or operative treatment decisions are known. The radiography is known as acomplement for the current diagnosis of dental caries. The agreement between the visualtactileand the radiographic caries tests varies depending upon the caries prevalence. Purpose:To compare the number of proximal caries lesions detected radiographically and thevisual-tactile method. Methods: Visual-tactile (DMF-S criteria) and radiographic (bite-wingx-rays) examinations were conducted in 40 16-to-35 year olds. Results: The mean DMF-T was4.9±3.4 (D: 0.2±0.4; M: 0; F: 4.9±3.4). The visual-tactile exam in the posterior teeth showed amean DF-S of 5.0±4.0 (D: 0.2±0.5), and the radiographic of 16.0±3.4 (Radiolucency in dentine:2.9±1.7; in enamel: 13.1±3.3). The level of agreement (Kappa coefficient) between thevisual-tactile and the radiographic methods was insignificant (0.0012-0.08). Conclusion: Theradiographic exam detects 220 % more proximal caries lesions than the visual-tactile examin posterior teeth, which allows emphasizing the importance of the radiographic examinationfor the detection of dental caries.en
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed
dc.format.extent7
dc.format.extent178712
dc.identifier.citationMartignon, S, Uribe, S E, Pulido, A M, Cortés, A & Martínez, L F G 2013, 'Comparación entre el examen radiográfico y el visual-táctil para detectar y valorar caries dental interproximal', Universitas Odontologica, vol. 32, no. 68, pp. 25-31.
dc.identifier.issn0120-4319
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.rsu.lv/jspui/handle/123456789/9406
dc.identifier.urlhttps://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revUnivOdontologica/article/view/SICI%3A%202027-3444%28201301%2932%3A68%3C25%3ACERVTD%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Y#:~:text=Conclusi%C3%B3n%3A%20El%20examen%20radiogr%C3%A1fico%20detecta,la%20detecci%C3%B3n%20de%20caries%20dental.
dc.language.isospa
dc.relation.ispartofUniversitas Odontologica
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectdental caries
dc.subjectradiographic diagnosis
dc.subjectvisual-tactile diagnosis
dc.subjectagreement
dc.subject3.2 Clinical medicine
dc.subject1.3. Anonymously reviewed scientific article published in a journal with an international editorial board and is available in another indexed database
dc.titleComparación entre el examen radiográfico y el visual-táctil para detectar y valorar caries dental interproximales
dc.title.alternativeComparison between Radiographic and Visual-Tactile Exams for the Detection and Assessment of Proximal Cariesen
dc.type/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
adminpujojs_6209_23950_1_CE.pdf
Size:
174.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Research outputs from Pure / Zinātniskās darbības rezultāti no ZDIS Pure