Donor Site Morbidity ( Chin vs Mandibular Ramus ) during Bone Transplantation Procedures
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Rīgas Stradiņa universitāte
Rīga Stradiņš University
Rīga Stradiņš University
Abstract
Kaulu transplantācijas operāciju bieži ir nepieciešamas, lai atrofētais alveolārais kauls nodrošinātu pietiekamu kaulu apjomu zobu implantu ievietošanai. Starp pieejamajiem potēšanas materiāliem autogēnais kauls tiek uzskatīts par vislabvēlīgāko tā bioloģisko īpašību dēļ. Tomēr autogēnie kaulu transplantāti ir saistīti arī ar donoru vietas saslimstību. Šajā sistēmiskajā pārskatā tiks salīdzināta apakšžokļa simfīzes un apakšžokļa ramusa donoru vietas saslimstība. Ir meklētas dažādas tiešsaistes datubāzes, lai savāktu atbilstošu literatūru par šo tēmu. Apakšžokļa ramusa donora vietas saslimstības ietver īslaicīgu trismu un perioperatīvu asiņošanu. Savukārt apakšžokļa simfīze ir saistīta ar lielāku neirosensoru traucējumu risku, kā arī ar paaugstinātu nepieciešamību pēc donora vietai blakus esošo zobu sakņu kanālu ārstēšanas.
Bone augmentation procedures are often necessary for the atrophied alveolar bone to provide enough bone volume for the placement of dental implants. Among the available grafting materials is autogenous bone considered the most favourable due to its biological properties. Nevertheless, autogenous bone grafts are also associated with donor site morbidities. This systemic review will compare the donor site morbidities of the mandibular symphysis and the mandibular ramus. Different online databases have been searched to collect relevant literature on this topic. Donor site morbidities of the mandibular ramus include temporary trismus and perioperative bleeding. While the mandibular symphysis is associated with higher risk for neurosensory disturbances as well as the increased necessity for root canal treatment of neighbouring teeth to the donor site.
Bone augmentation procedures are often necessary for the atrophied alveolar bone to provide enough bone volume for the placement of dental implants. Among the available grafting materials is autogenous bone considered the most favourable due to its biological properties. Nevertheless, autogenous bone grafts are also associated with donor site morbidities. This systemic review will compare the donor site morbidities of the mandibular symphysis and the mandibular ramus. Different online databases have been searched to collect relevant literature on this topic. Donor site morbidities of the mandibular ramus include temporary trismus and perioperative bleeding. While the mandibular symphysis is associated with higher risk for neurosensory disturbances as well as the increased necessity for root canal treatment of neighbouring teeth to the donor site.
Description
Zobārstniecība
Dentistry
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care
Dentistry
Veselības aprūpe
Health Care
Keywords
Kaula transplantācijas operāciju komplikācijas donora vietā, Bone augmentation, Bone graft, autogenous bone, Donor site morbidity, morbidity, Chin, Symphysis, Mandibular ramus