Court’s Ability to Assess Evidence Obtained During Operational Activities

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKlāviņa, Gerda
dc.contributor.authorZanders, Ansis
dc.contributor.otherTalsi District of Kurzeme Regional Administration of State Police, Latviaen
dc.contributor.otherVentspils District of Kurzeme Regional Administration of State Police, Latviaen
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-29T12:40:54Z
dc.date.available2021-12-29T12:40:54Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThe article discusses the court’s ability to assess information of evidence obtained during operational activities. It addresses only the cases where a person is found guilty of a criminal offence and criminal punishment has been imposed by a court judgment, without considering cases where the punishment has been determined by the public prosecutor when drawing up a penal order. The aim of the study is to examine the possibilities of the court to assess information of evidence about facts obtained in operational activities, to identify legal and practical issues for the court’s ability to assess such information, as well as to propose solutions. Material and methods used in the preparation of the article include analysis and description of regulatory enactments, court judgments, comparative and lo­gical method. These materials and methods help to achieve the goal of the research. Analysing normative acts and court judgments, describing normative acts and court judgments in the article, analysis and description of normative acts and court judgments have been used for the compositon of the research. The comparative method has been used to compare provisions of regulatory enactments, while the logical method has been used to draw conclusions. Methods of interpretation of legal norms – grammatical, systemic and teleological method – have also been used in the composition of the study.en
dc.formatElectronic
dc.identifier.citationKlāviņa, G., Zanders, A. (2021). Court’s Ability to Assess Evidence Obtained During Operational Activities. Electronic Scientific Journal of Law Socrates, 3 (21). 149–158. https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.21.2021.3.149-158en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.25143/socr.21.2021.3.149-158
dc.identifier.issn2256-0548
dc.identifier.other149–158
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.rsu.lv/jspui/handle/123456789/7136
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRīga Stradiņš Universityen
dc.publisherRīgas Stradiņa universitātelv_LV
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSocrates 2021, 3 (21)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectSocrates 2021, 3 (21)
dc.subjectcourten
dc.subjectcriminal proceedingsen
dc.subjectevidenceen
dc.titleCourt’s Ability to Assess Evidence Obtained During Operational Activitiesen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Socrates-21-10_Klaavinja-Zanders_149-158.pdf
Size:
143.05 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Socrates. 2021, 3 (21)