Browsing by Author "Maconochie, Ian K."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Febrile children with comorbidities at the emergency department — a multicentre observational study
    (2022-09) Borensztajn, Dorine M.; Hagedoorn, Nienke N.; Carrol, Enitan D.; von Both, Ulrich; Emonts, Marieke; van der Flier, Michiel; de Groot, Ronald; Herberg, Jethro; Kohlmaier, Benno; Levin, Michael; Lim, Emma; Maconochie, Ian K.; Martinon-Torres, Federico; Nijman, Ruud G.; Pokorn, Marko; Rivero-Calle, Irene; Tsolia, Maria; van der Velden, Fabian J.S.; Vermont, Clementien; Zavadska, Dace; Zenz, Werner; Zachariasse, Joany M.; Moll, Henriette A.; Department of Paediatrics
    We aimed to describe characteristics and management of children with comorbidities attending European emergency departments (EDs) with fever. MOFICHE (Management and Outcome of Fever in children in Europe) is a prospective multicentre study (12 European EDs, 8 countries). Febrile children with comorbidities were compared to those without in terms of patient characteristics, markers of disease severity, management, and diagnosis. Comorbidity was defined as a chronic underlying condition that is expected to last > 1 year. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis, displaying adjusted odds ratios (aOR), adjusting for patient characteristics. We included 38,110 patients, of whom 5906 (16%) had comorbidities. Most common comorbidities were pulmonary, neurologic, or prematurity. Patients with comorbidities more often were ill appearing (20 versus 16%, p < 0.001), had an ED-Paediatric Early Warning Score of > 15 (22 versus 12%, p < 0.001), or a C-reactive protein > 60 mg/l (aOR 1.4 (95%CI 1.3–1.6)). They more often required life-saving interventions (aOR 2.7, 95% CI 2.2–3.3), were treated with intravenous antibiotics (aOR 2.3, 95%CI 2.1–2.5), and were admitted to the ward (aOR 2.2, 95%CI 2.1–2.4) or paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) (aOR 5.5, 95% CI 3.8–7.9). They were more often diagnosed with serious bacterial infections (aOR 1.8, 95%CI 1.7–2.0), including sepsis/meningitis (aOR 4.6, 95%CI 3.2–6.7). Children most at risk for sepsis/meningitis were children with malignancy/immunodeficiency (aOR 14.5, 8.5–24.8), while children with psychomotor delay/neurological disease were most at risk for life-saving interventions (aOR 5.3, 4.1–6.9) or PICU admission (aOR 9.7, 6.1–15.5). Conclusions: Our data show how children with comorbidities are a population at risk, as they more often are diagnosed with bacterial infections and more often require PICU admission and life-saving interventions.What is Known:• While children with comorbidity constitute a large part of ED frequent flyers, they are often excluded from studies.What is New:• Children with comorbidities in general are more ill upon presentation than children without comorbidities.• Children with comorbidities form a heterogeneous group; specific subgroups have an increased risk for invasive bacterial infections, while others have an increased risk of invasive interventions such as PICU admission, regardless of the cause of the fever.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Research priorities for European paediatric emergency medicine
    (2019-09) Bressan, Silvia; Titomanlio, Luigi; Gomez, Borja; Mintegi, Santiago; Gervaix, Alain; Parri, Niccolo; Da Dalt, Liviana; Moll, Henriette A.; Waisman, Yehezkel; Maconochie, Ian K.; Oostenbrink, Rianne; Er, Anil; Anil, Murat; Bal, Alkan; Manzano, Sergio; Lacroix, Laurance; Galetto, Annick; Beattie, Tom; Bidlingmaier, Christoph; de Lucas, Nieves; Maranon, Rafael; Pucuka, Zanda; Loellgen, Ruth; Keitel, Kristina; Hoeffe, Julia; Geurts, Dorien; Dubos, Francois; Lyttle, Mark; Bognar, Zsolt; Simon, Gabor; Fodor, Laszlo; Romanengo, Marta; Gras-le-Guen, Christele; Greber-Platzer, Susanne; Cubells, Carles Luaces; Teksam, Ozlem; Turan, Caner; van de Voorde, Patrick; Basmaci, Romain; Frassanito, Antonella; Saz, Ulas; Irfanos, Ionannis; Sotoca, Jorge; Berant, Ron; Farrugia, Ruth; Velasco, Roberto; Nijman, Ruud; Macao, Patricia
    Objective Research in European Paediatric Emergency Medicine (REPEM) network is a collaborative group of 69 paediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians from 20 countries in Europe, initiated in 2006. To further improve paediatric emergency care in Europe, the aim of this study was to define research priorities for PEM in Europe to guide the development of future research projects. Design and Setting We carried out an online survey in a modified three-stage Delphi study. Eligible participants were members of the REPEM network. In stage 1, the REPEM steering committee prepared a list of research topics. In stage 2, REPEM members rated on a 6-point scale research topics and they could add research topics and comment on the list for further refinement. Stage 3 included further prioritisation using the Hanlon Process of Prioritisation (HPP) to give more emphasis to the feasibility of a research topic. Results Based on 52 respondents (response rates per stage varying from 41% to 57%), we identified the conditions 'fever', 'sepsis' and 'respiratory infections', and the processes/interventions 'biomarkers', 'risk stratification' and 'practice variation' as common themes of research interest. The HPP identified highest priority for 4 of the 5 highest prioritised items by the Delphi process, incorporating prevalence and severity of each condition and feasibility of undertaking such research. Conclusions While the high diversity in emergency department (ED) populations, cultures, healthcare systems and healthcare delivery in European PEM prompts to focus on practice variation of ED conditions, our defined research priority list will help guide further collaborative research efforts within the REPEM network to improve PEM care in Europe.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Sex differences in febrile children with respiratory symptoms attending European emergency departments : An observational multicenter study
    (2022-08-03) Tan, Chantal D.; el Ouasghiri, Soufiane; von Both, Ulrich; Carrol, Enitan D.; Emonts, Marieke; van der Flier, Michiel; de Groot, Ronald; Herberg, Jethro; Kohlmaier, Benno; Levin, Michael; Lim, Emma; Maconochie, Ian K.; Martinon-Torres, Federico; Nijman, Ruud G.; Pokorn, Marko; Rivero-Calle, Irene; Tsolia, Maria; Vermont, Clementien L.; Zenz, Werner; Zavadska, Dace; Moll, Henriette A.; Zachariasse, Joany M.; Department of Paediatrics
    Objective To assess sex differences in presentation and management of febrile children with respiratory symptoms attending European Emergency Departments. Design and setting An observational study in twelve Emergency Departments in eight European countries. Patients Previously healthy children aged 0-<18 years with fever (≥ 38°C) at the Emergency Department or in the consecutive three days before Emergency Department visit and respiratory symptoms were included. Main outcome measures The main outcomes were patient characteristics and management defined as diagnostic tests, treatment and admission. Descriptive statistics were used for patient characteristics and management stratified by sex. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for the association between sex and management with adjustment for age, disease severity and Emergency Department. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed in children with upper and lower respiratory tract infections and in children below five years. Results We included 19,781 febrile children with respiratory symptoms. The majority were boys (54%), aged 1-5 years (58%) and triaged as low urgent (67%). Girls presented less frequently with tachypnea (15% vs 16%, p = 0.002) and increased work of breathing (8% vs 12%, p<0.001) compared with boys. Girls received less inhalation medication than boys (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.90), but received antibiotic treatment more frequently than boys (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.15), which is associated with a higher prevalence of urinary tract infections. Amongst children with a lower respiratory tract infection and children below five years girls received less inhalation medication than boys (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.89; aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.90). Conclusions Sex differences concerning presentation and management are present in previously healthy febrile children with respiratory symptoms presenting to the Emergency Department. Future research should focus on whether these differences are related to clinicians' attitudes, differences in clinical symptoms at the time of presentation and disease severity.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Variation in hospital admission in febrile children evaluated at the Emergency Department (ED) in Europe : PERFORM, a multicentre prospective observational study
    (2021-01-07) Borensztajn, Dorine M.; Hagedoorn, Nienke N.; Calle, Irene Rivero; Maconochie, Ian K.; von Both, Ulrich; Carrol, Enitan D.; Dewez, Juan Emmanuel; Emonts, Marieke; van der Flier, Michiel; de Groot, Ronald; Herberg, Jethro; Kohlmaier, Benno; Lim, Emma; Martinon-Torres, Federico; Nieboer, Daan; Nijman, Ruud G.; Pokorn, Marko; Strle, Franc; Tsolia, Maria; Vermont, Clementien; Yeung, Shunmay; Zavadska, Dace; Zenz, Werner; Levin, Michael; Moll, Henriette A.; Department of Paediatrics
    OBJECTIVES: Hospitalisation is frequently used as a marker of disease severity in observational Emergency Department (ED) studies. The comparison of ED admission rates is complex in potentially being influenced by the characteristics of the region, ED, physician and patient. We aimed to study variation in ED admission rates of febrile children, to assess whether variation could be explained by disease severity and to identify patient groups with large variation, in order to use this to reduce unnecessary health care utilization that is often due to practice variation. DESIGN: MOFICHE (Management and Outcome of Fever in children in Europe, part of the PERFORM study, www.perform2020.org), is a prospective cohort study using routinely collected data on febrile children regarding patient characteristics (age, referral, vital signs and clinical alarming signs), diagnostic tests, therapy, diagnosis and hospital admission. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected on febrile children aged 0-18 years presenting to 12 European EDs (2017-2018). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We compared admission rates between EDs by using standardised admission rates after adjusting for patient characteristics and initiated tests at the ED, where standardised rates >1 demonstrate higher admission rates than expected and rates <1 indicate lower rates than expected based on the ED patient population. RESULTS: We included 38,120 children. Of those, 9.695 (25.4%) were admitted to a general ward (range EDs 5.1-54.5%). Adjusted standardised admission rates ranged between 0.6 and 1.5. The largest variation was seen in short admission rates (0.1-5.0), PICU admission rates (0.2-2.2), upper respiratory tract infections (0.4-1.7) and fever without focus (0.5-2.7). Variation was small in sepsis/meningitis (0.9-1.1). CONCLUSIONS: Large variation exists in admission rates of febrile children evaluated at European EDs, however, this variation is largely reduced after correcting for patient characteristics and therefore overall admission rates seem to adequately reflect disease severity or a potential for a severe disease course. However, for certain patient groups variation remains high even after adjusting for patient characteristics.