Browsing by Author "Daugule, Ilva"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Non-invasive diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease using gastrin- and pepsinogen-based tests
    (2018) Moisejevs, Georgijs; Daugule, Ilva; Isajevs, Sergejs; Rudzite, Dace; Janciauskas, Dainius; Tolmanis, Ivars; Leja, Marcis; Scientific Laboratory of Molecular Genetics; Department of Internal Diseases
    Gastrin-17 (G-17), pepsinogen-1 (Pg1) and pepsinogen-2 (Pg2) reflect the functional state of gas-tric mucosa and are used for non-invasive diagnosis and screening of atrophic gastritis. The aimof the study was to clarify if erosive reflux disease (ERD) or non-ERD (NERD) can be distin-guished from other dyspeptic conditions in patients, in a non-invasive manner using specificbiomarkers. Levels of G-17, Pg1, and Pg2 were measured in 141 ERD patients (median age 48years, males — 68), 122 NERD patients (median age 45 years, males — 32) and 410 control pa-tients (median age 50 years, males — 97). Levels of biomarkers in ERD and NERD groups werecompared to controls. Median levels of G-17 (1.94 vs 2.92 pmol/L, p = 0.036) and Pg2 (6.70 vs7.79 μg/l,p= 0.046) were lower in the ERD group compared to control patients; no differencewith respect to the control was found for the NERD group. After exclusion of the patients havingat least one potential condition that might modify the levels of the biomarkers (gastric mucosa at-rophy, Helicobacter pylori colonisation), no difference in levels of biomarkers was observed withrespect to the control for both the ERD and NERD groups. G-17, Pg1, and Pg2 based tests can-not be used to distinguish ERD or NERD from other dyspeptic conditions in patients.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Pepsinogen testing for evaluation of the success of Helicobacter pylori eradication at 4 weeks after completion of therapy
    (2014) Leja, Marcis; Lapina, Sanita; Polaka, Inese; Rudzite, Dace; Vilkoite, Ilona; Daugule, Ilva; Belkovets, Anna; Pimanov, Sergey; Makarenko, Jelena; Tolmanis, Ivars; Lejnieks, Aivars; Boka, Viesturs; Rumba-Rozenfelde, Ingrida; Vikmanis, Uldis; Rīga Stradiņš University
    Background and objective: Pepsinogen levels in plasma are increased by inflammation in the gastric mucosa, including inflammation resulting from Helicobacter pylori infection. A decrease in pepsinogen II level has been suggested as a reliable marker to confirm the successful eradication of infection. The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential role of pepsinogens I and II, gastrin-17 and H. pylori antibodies in confirming successful eradication. Material and methods: Altogether 42 patients (25 women, 17 men), mean age 45 years (range 23-74), were enrolled. Pepsinogens I and II, gastrin-17 and H. pylori IgG antibodies were measured in plasma samples using an ELISA test (Biohit, Oyj., Finland) before the eradication and 4 weeks after completing the treatment. The success of eradication was determined by a urea breath test. Results: Eradication was successful in 31 patients (74%) and unsuccessful in 11 patients (26%). Pepsinogen II decreased significantly in both the successful (P = 0.029) and unsuccessful (P = 0.042) eradication groups. Pepsinogen I decreased significantly in the successful (P = 0.025) but not the unsuccessful (P = 0.29) eradication group. The pepsinogen I/II ratio increased in the successful eradication group (P = 0.0018) but not in the group in which treatment failed (P = 0.12). There were no differences in gastrin-17 or H. pylori antibody values. Conclusions: A decrease in pepsinogen II levels cannot be used as a reliable marker for the successful eradication of H. pylori 4 weeks after the completion of treatment. The increase in pepsinogen I/II ratio reflects differences in pepsinogen production following the eradication irrespective of improvement in atrophy.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Who Could Be Blamed in the Case of Discrepant Histology and Serology Results for Helicobacter pylori Detection?
    (2022-01) Skrebinska, Sabine; Megraud, Francis; Daugule, Ilva; Santare, Daiga; Isajevs, Sergejs; Liepniece-Karele, Inta; Bogdanova, Inga; Rudzite, Dace; Vangravs, Reinis; Kikuste, Ilze; Vanags, Aigars; Tolmanis, Ivars; Savcenko, Selga; Alix, Chloé; Herrero, Rolando; Park, Jin Young; Leja, Marcis
    Background. Discrepancies between histology and serology results for Helicobacter pylori detection could be caused by a variety of factors, including a biopsy sampling error, expertise of the pathologist, natural loss of infection due to advanced atrophy, or a false-positive serology in the case of a previous infection, since antibodies may be present in blood following recovery from the infection. Aims. To identify true H. pylori-positive individuals in discrepant cases by serology and histology using real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as a gold standard. Methods. Study subjects with discrepant histology and serology results were selected from the GISTAR pilot study data base in Latvia. Subjects having received previous H. pylori eradication therapy or reporting use of proton pump inhibitors, antibacterial medications, or bismuth containing drugs one month prior to upper endoscopy were excluded. We compared the discrepant cases to the corresponding results of RT-PCR performed on gastric biopsies. Results. In total, 97 individuals with discrepant results were identified: 81 subjects were serology-positive/histology-negative, while 16 were serologynegative/histology-positive. Among the serology-positive/histology-negative cases, 64/81 (79.0%) were false-positives by serology and, for the majority, inflammation was absent in all biopsies, while, in the serology-negative/histology-positive group, only 6.2% were proven false-positives by histology. Conclusions. Among this high H. pylori prevalent, middle-aged population, the majority of discrepant cases between serology and histology were due to false positive-serology, rather than false-negative histology. This confirms the available evidence that the choice of treatment should not be based solely on the serological results, but also after excluding previous, self-reported eradication therapy.